2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence and prognostic factors in borderline ovarian tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
24
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Like our study, in a French retrospective multicenter study, Fauvet et al (12) evaluated 360 women treated for BOT and pointed out that the most common symptom at diagnosis was pelvic pain (27%). Ayhan et al (9) reported that the most common complaints at admission were abdominal mass (37%) and abdominal pain (29%). In the study by Messalli et al (8), 49% of patients with BOT were asymptomatic and in premenopausal patients the most common symptom was menstrual disorders (44%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like our study, in a French retrospective multicenter study, Fauvet et al (12) evaluated 360 women treated for BOT and pointed out that the most common symptom at diagnosis was pelvic pain (27%). Ayhan et al (9) reported that the most common complaints at admission were abdominal mass (37%) and abdominal pain (29%). In the study by Messalli et al (8), 49% of patients with BOT were asymptomatic and in premenopausal patients the most common symptom was menstrual disorders (44%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of women with micropapillary features and intraepithelial carcinoma in our series was too small to analyze the risk of upstaging in these settings. Ayhan et al [33], after comprehensive staging of women with borderline ovarian tumors, found that the overall tumor-free survival rate was significantly lower for younger patients (age, <30 years) after fertility-sparing surgery, and when a micropapillary architecture or peritoneal implants were present. Moreover, Longacre et al [34] found that recurrent disease and/or progression to lowgrade serous carcinoma was related to the FIGO stage, invasive implants, microinvasion in the primary tumor, and a micropapillary architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respecto de los factores pronósticos, solo los implantes peritoneales y probablemente la arquitectura micropapilar, representan un pronóstico adverso, en términos de recurrencia y sobrevida (1). El compromiso ganglionar linfático pélvico y lumboaórtico, presente en el 7 a 18% de los casos, no cambia el pronóstico (1,28).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El compromiso ganglionar linfático pélvico y lumboaórtico, presente en el 7 a 18% de los casos, no cambia el pronóstico (1,28).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified