2001
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-6-200103200-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Ventricular Function after Myocardial Infarction in the Reperfusion Era: The Healing and Early Afterload Reducing Therapy Study

Abstract: Significant myocardial stunning with subsequent improvement of ventricular function occurred in the majority of patients after Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction. A lower peak level of creatine kinase, an estimate of the extent of necrosis, is independently predictive of recovery of function. Early functional assessment (day 1 after acute myocardial infarction) had limited ability to predict recovery of ventricular function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
1
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
111
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, partial or complete recovery of LVEF has been observed in more than half of patients at 3 months after AMI after institution of heart failure therapies or revascularization. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Guideline-directed medical therapy with β-blockade and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonism during the early period after diagnosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy may result in improved ventricular function and decreased future risk of SCD; 50% of patients with newly diagnosed nonischemic cardiomyopathy will demonstrate a 10% improvement in LVEF with the initiation of medical therapy. 21,22 Although the rationale and reasons for postponing ICD implantation are sensible, the current evidence base is incomplete.…”
Section: Table 1 Applying Classification Of Recommendations and Levementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, partial or complete recovery of LVEF has been observed in more than half of patients at 3 months after AMI after institution of heart failure therapies or revascularization. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Guideline-directed medical therapy with β-blockade and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonism during the early period after diagnosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy may result in improved ventricular function and decreased future risk of SCD; 50% of patients with newly diagnosed nonischemic cardiomyopathy will demonstrate a 10% improvement in LVEF with the initiation of medical therapy. 21,22 Although the rationale and reasons for postponing ICD implantation are sensible, the current evidence base is incomplete.…”
Section: Table 1 Applying Classification Of Recommendations and Levementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the trial have been described. [13][14][15] Serum samples from days 1, 14, and 90 after MI from 69 randomly chosen patients in the HEART trial were assayed for soluble ST2 with a sandwich ELISA. 16 Serum ST2 levels in mice were measured with a sandwich ELISA using a rat monoclonal anti-mouse ST2 antibody (Morwell Diagnostics) and a rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse ST2 antibody.…”
Section: Patient Studies and Elisa For St2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abrupt myocyte loss leading to contractile dysfunction and AHF is an obvious mechanism, and the extent of biomarker elevation correlates with prognosis and the range of functional recovery. 4 In those without extensive myocyte necrosis, postischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) leading to AHF can result from transient myocardial stunning or hibernation depending on the extent of coronary reperfusion. 5 Ventricular remodeling can increase wall stress to viable regions that may be relatively underperfused, furthering ischemia and adding to this cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%