Recovery following stroke: The role of self-management education

Kendall, Elizabeth; Catalano, Tara Michelle; Kuipers, Pim; Posner, Natasha; Buys, Nicholas J.; Charker, Jill

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.012

Cited by 147 publications

(172 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

166

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…22,27,28 One study 41 did not have a confirmed PEdro score and it was calculated independently by two authors and disagreements were resolved by discussion. Eleven studies 23,24,26,[29][30][31]34,[42][43][44][45] did not perform an intention to treat analysis. More than 15% of loss to follow-up occurred in four studies.…”

Section: Quality Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rehabilitation Interventions for Improving Social Participation After Stroke

Obembe

Eng

2015

Neurorehabil Neural Repair

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Quality Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study each reported that no adverse events 25 and no serious adverse events occurred. 37 Seventeen studies [22][23][24]26,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]39,[43][44][45] , including ten with exercise components, did not state whether any adverse events occurred or not.…”

Section: Quality Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Rehabilitation Interventions for Improving Social Participation After Stroke

Obembe

Eng

2015

Neurorehabil Neural Repair

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The focus of health care professionals, particularly early in the period following stroke, is on physical functioning in rehabilitation. In contrast, difficulties in daily living, and the psychological and social problems experienced following a stroke are often overlooked [7][8][9]. When stroke survivors leave hospital and return to live in the community, they are left to face a new reality which often includes coping with physical and/or cognitive impairments, dependency on others, loss of identity, social isolation, diminished self-esteem, and fears about disfigurement and death [10][11][12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Well-Being in Stroke Survivors

Maujean

Davis²

2013

Int J Phys Med Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Indeed, there may be many and varied reasons why individuals do not engage in standardised selfmanagement support. Several authors have noted the inherent inequity of self-management programmes as favouring those with good health literacy and motivations to engage (Kendall, Catalano, Posner, Buys, & Charker, 2007;Taylor & Bury, 2007). In fact, non-engagement could be entirely understandable in someone living with a complex long term condition such as stroke and facing challenging personal, social or cognitive circumstances (Hinder & Greenhalgh, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building Bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: A coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke

Jones

Pöstges

Brimicombe

2016

NRE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. BACKGROUND:Programmes providing self-management support for patients and families are gaining attention and have shown promising outcomes with regards to reducing long-term unmet needs post stroke. However, notions of what good selfmanagement support looks like can differ depending on professional opinion, individual preferences, skills and experiences of patients and their families as well as on how care and rehabilitation is organised in a particular healthcare setting. This resonates with the perspective of patient-centred care, according to which the meaning of good care is not universal, but rather jointly shaped between healthcare professionals and patients in everyday interactions. While self-management support is continuously co-produced in care and rehabilitation practices, most self-management programmes are typically provided as an 'add-on' to existing statutory care. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to deepen the understanding of how self-management support can be made an integral part of everyday care and rehabilitation using Bridges methodology. METHODS:The authors provide a self-reflective account on 'Bridges' an integrated approach to self-management support, which is used by healthcare professionals within acute and community stroke rehabilitation across the UK, and in some parts of New Zealand and Australia. RESULTS: Bridges is based on self-efficacy principles, but has a central aim of professionals sharing decision-making and expertise with patients and families in every healthcare interaction. Methodologically, the co-production of a Bridges support package with local healthcare professionals and patients is critical. The authors present the values articulated by the support package and how it engages professionals, patients and Bridges training facilitators in a continuous process of adjusting and re-adjusting situated self-management support practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our reflections reveal the need to consider development and implementation of self-management support as one and the same on-going process, if we are to facilitate successful engagement and interest from healthcare professionals as well as their patients and families.

show abstract

Recovery following stroke: The role of self-management education

Cited by 147 publications

References 30 publications

Rehabilitation Interventions for Improving Social Participation After Stroke

Rehabilitation Interventions for Improving Social Participation After Stroke

The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Well-Being in Stroke Survivors

Building Bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: A coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About