2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-019-00727-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovering Brain Dynamics During Concurrent tACS-M/EEG: An Overview of Analysis Approaches and Their Methodological and Interpretational Pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus crucial to validate that tACS effects can be reliably induced in less controlled environments outside the laboratory and to find out which environmental conditions may determine stimulation success. While the assessment of online effects of tACS on EEG oscillations remains a major challenge due to a massive stimulation artefact introduced to electrophysiological recordings-see [114] for a review-the study of stimulation aftereffects in the EEG still provides the most direct evidence for tACS efficacy in naturalistic, or real-life, experiments. In addition, EEG-guided tACS parameter selection may be useful to increase the effects of stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus crucial to validate that tACS effects can be reliably induced in less controlled environments outside the laboratory and to find out which environmental conditions may determine stimulation success. While the assessment of online effects of tACS on EEG oscillations remains a major challenge due to a massive stimulation artefact introduced to electrophysiological recordings-see [114] for a review-the study of stimulation aftereffects in the EEG still provides the most direct evidence for tACS efficacy in naturalistic, or real-life, experiments. In addition, EEG-guided tACS parameter selection may be useful to increase the effects of stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do not have direct insights to what extent tACS has induced lateralized power changes in the targeted frequency bands due to technical limitations of our EEG system. Assessing effects of tACS on electrophysiological measures imposes a major challenge, as EEG signals are massively contaminated by a strong electromagnetic artifact that cannot be reliably removed up to this point 22 . Given recent successful attempts to uncover online effects of tACS on event-related oscillations 29 , 46 , future studies may be able to directly observe effects of lateralized α- and γ-tACS on (event-related) inter-hemispheric α-/γ-power asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid electrical stimulation/EEG device allows for time-efficient application of multiple stimulation and EEG electrodes and flexible remote control over stimulation signals. However, due to insufficient dynamic range of the EEG system, the large stimulation artifact resulted in saturation of the EEG signals precluding any analysis of EEG signals during stimulation 22 . We further refrained from analyzing task related EEG due to the low spatial sampling available from the system (4-channels).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These residuals likely originate from non-linear modulations of the tACS artifact elicited by physiological processes in the human body (Noury et al, 2016;Noury and Siegel, 2018), which also have to be taken into account in EEG recordings. The issue of tACS artifact correction in MEG data is discussed elsewhere (Neuling et al, 2015;Noury et al, 2016;Neuling et al, 2017;Noury and Siegel, 2018;Kasten and Herrmann, 2019) and will not be further addressed in this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%