“…Despite clinical benefits of IVIG or SCIG therapies, the need for repetitive infusion treatments, eventually in the setting of clinical visits can negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients [71][72][73]. For patients who successfully manage home-based administration of SCIG, Administrated subcutaneously [70] Treatment location Hospital, doctor office, or infusion center [70] Home treatment by a health care professional [79] Home self-treatment [70] Administration Requires a health care professional [82] Administered by patient or caregiver after instruction by a health care professional [ More flexibility and independency [72,74] Costs More expensive than SCIG at high doses and if therapy is given over a long period of time [81,82,85,88,89] Potential to be more cost-effective in certain markets than IVIG for long-term therapy [81,82,85,88,89] the gain of flexibility and autonomy might add value and increase their QoL [71,[74][75][76]. In a conjoint survey including 252 adult patients and 66 parents of children with PID, both groups preferred a home setting, monthly frequency, fewer needle sticks, and shorter treatment durations of IG treatment relative to alternative choices (p < 0.05) [77].…”