1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of a historical genealogy by means of STR analysis and Y-haplotyping of ancient DNA

Abstract: Archaeological excavations in St Margaretha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports of ancient nuclear DNA so far are mainly based on animal skeleton finds (38-42). There are a few studies that report consistent amplification of STR profiles from human skeletal remains (33,34,43,44). We applied the genotyping and reproduction strategies developed in these studies to our sample of 51 bones that previously yielded reproducible human mitochondrial DNA sequences in association with excellently preserved animal bones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of ancient nuclear DNA so far are mainly based on animal skeleton finds (38-42). There are a few studies that report consistent amplification of STR profiles from human skeletal remains (33,34,43,44). We applied the genotyping and reproduction strategies developed in these studies to our sample of 51 bones that previously yielded reproducible human mitochondrial DNA sequences in association with excellently preserved animal bones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides sex determination, another potential of the markers used here should be mentioned: X-and Y-STRs are polymorphic STRs with a structure similar to that of autosomal STRs, and are inherited as haplotypes (Y-STRs) or in a haplotype-like way (closely linked X-STRs), so that they can also be used for extended kinship analysis Gerstenberger et al, 1999), or in forensic deficiency cases (Hering et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have evaluated the probability of familial relationship using phenotypic data (e.g., Alt and Vach 1995a, b;Alt et al 1997;Doi et al 1986;Hanihara et al 1983;Matsumura and Nishimoto 1996) and genetic data (e.g., Gerstenberger et al 1999;Hummel and Herrmann 1996;KeyserTracqui et al 2003;Scholz et al 2001;Shinoda and Kanai 1999;Shinoda and Kunisada 1994), while others have attempted to reconstruct pedigrees among individuals (e.g., Rösing 1986;Spence 1996). Studies also have explored the goodness of fit between results obtained from genetic and phenotypic data and the relative effectiveness of different types of phenotypic traits in reconstructing biological relatedness (e.g., Adachi et al 2003;Corruccini and Shimada 2002;Shimada et al 2004;Shinoda et al 1998).…”
Section: Bioarchaeological Kinship Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%