1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(199806)45:7<469::aid-bip1>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the protein–water interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
102
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(13 reference statements)
7
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed the existence of a hydration shell whose average density is around 10% larger than that of the bulk water. Molecular dynamics simulation studies also suggested that the variation in the first hydration shell density is subject to the electrostatic properties of the protein surface and local surface topography (Makarov et al, 1998(Makarov et al, , 2000Dastidar & Mukhopadhyay, 2003). However, the properties of the hydrated water shells are still the subject of many experimental and theoretical investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed the existence of a hydration shell whose average density is around 10% larger than that of the bulk water. Molecular dynamics simulation studies also suggested that the variation in the first hydration shell density is subject to the electrostatic properties of the protein surface and local surface topography (Makarov et al, 1998(Makarov et al, , 2000Dastidar & Mukhopadhyay, 2003). However, the properties of the hydrated water shells are still the subject of many experimental and theoretical investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when used in conjunction with a Voronoi-like spacial (volume) normalization 6 to the distribution's first terms, g ij (r, 1) → 1 as r → ∞, so that the approximation g ij (r) ≈ g ⊥ ij (r, 1) holds at long distance.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Now, for the left-handed proximal distributions of the macromolecule-water distributions, the m sites are many more than if the right-handed g ij (r, n) functions were used, since n m for water, as in the more common convention. 3,4,[6][7][8] Using the larger number of macromolecular sites to expand the neighbor hierarchy in allows for the fine-grained functionalization of the excess energy per molecule over the m-member hierarchy:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations