2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1109987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the Origin of Andaman Islanders

Abstract: The origin of the Andaman "Negrito" and Nicobar "Mongoloid" populations has been ambiguous. Our analyses of complete mitochondrial DNA sequences from Onges and Great Andaman populations revealed two deeply branching clades that share their most recent common ancestor in founder haplogroup M, with lineages spread among India, Africa, East Asia, New Guinea, and Australia. This distribution suggests that these two clades have likely survived in genetic isolation since the initial settlement of the islands during … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
205
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
10
205
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, these data provide further evidence that local H. erectus or archaic Homo sapiens populations did not contribute to the modern aboriginal Australian gene pool, nor did Australians and New Guineans derive from a hypothetical second migration out of Africa (38), nor is there any suggestion of a specific relationship with India (9,21,22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, these data provide further evidence that local H. erectus or archaic Homo sapiens populations did not contribute to the modern aboriginal Australian gene pool, nor did Australians and New Guineans derive from a hypothetical second migration out of Africa (38), nor is there any suggestion of a specific relationship with India (9,21,22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Comparing the Australian complete mtDNA sequences within the context of the Asian phylogeny (25,26,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45), we find that the Australians do not share any derived branches with Asians more recent than the founding types M, N, and R (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1,18 Mutations are recorded by comparing with the revised Cambridge reference sequence (rCRS). 19 All the individuals were allocated into specific haplogroup based on their control-region information; the assignments were further confirmed by typing additional diagnostic coding-region mutations according to the reconstructed phylogenetic trees of East Asian, 1,20-25 South Asian 5,7,12,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and Southeast Asian [34][35][36][37][38] (Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Material online). For the mtDNA sample of interest, entire genome was amplified and sequenced as described elsewhere.…”
Section: Dna Amplification Sequencing and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of this route has been further strengthened by genetic studies based on comparisons of DNA characteristics in modern populations, which seem to suggest a single rapid dispersal of modern humans out of Africa at about 70,000 years ago (Oppenheimer, 2003;Forster and Matsumura, 2005;Macaulay et al, 2005;Thangaraj et al, 2005), an idea that has been coupled with a supposedly new emphasis on marine resources that attracted modern human populations to productive coastlines and propelled them eastwards around the rim of the Indian Ocean (Stringer, 2000;Walter et al, 2000;Mellars, 2006;Bulbeck, 2007). Similarities of early stone-tool industries between East Africa, Arabia and the Indian subcontinent have been discussed in relation to this hypothesis (e.g.…”
Section: Geographical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%