1994
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin vs Transfusions in the Treatment of Anemia of Prematurity
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
34
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
9
0
0
Year Published
1995
2024
Publication Types
Select...
29
6
Relationship
0
35
Authors
Journals
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
References 29 publications
0
9
0
0
“…Further cost savings may be achieved by splitting a 2000 U r‐HuEPO vial into multiple doses under laminar flow and sharing it among infants receiving EPO in that week or by using a single vial each day for all infants receiving EPO. Studies 23,24 evaluating cost‐effectiveness of EPO versus transfusions to treat the anaemia of prematurity showed definite cost benefit with the practice of vial sharing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further cost savings may be achieved by splitting a 2000 U r‐HuEPO vial into multiple doses under laminar flow and sharing it among infants receiving EPO in that week or by using a single vial each day for all infants receiving EPO. Studies 23,24 evaluating cost‐effectiveness of EPO versus transfusions to treat the anaemia of prematurity showed definite cost benefit with the practice of vial sharing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,14,15 Multiple studies have attempted to reduce the transfusion requirements of preterm infants through the use of exogenous EPO. [7][8][9][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Earlier trials using EPO at less than 300 U/kg per week showed no reduction in the transfusion requirements of VLBW infants. 16,17,24 Nevertheless, data from controlled trials published since 1990 suggest that EPO at doses of over 500 U/kg per week is effective in inducing erythropoiesis and reduces transfusion requirements of VLBW infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30, 32, 71–74] The results varied, and the relative benefit of r-Epo for AoP is related to the study design (early versus late treatment; liberal versus restrictive transfusion criteria), patient population, and value assigned to complex outcomes. Not all studies took into account the risk of infection transmission, exclusion of which would lower the cost of transfusion.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Of Erythropoietin Usementioning
confidence: 99%
