2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2012.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of 3D facial expression dynamics

Abstract: a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oIn this paper we propose a method that exploits 3D motion-based features between frames of 3D facial geometry sequences for dynamic facial expression recognition. An expressive sequence is modelled to contain an onset followed by an apex and an offset. Feature selection methods are applied in order to extract features for each of the onset and offset segments of the expression. These features are then used to train GentleBoost classifiers and build a Hidden Markov Model in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, facial expressions have been analyzed [24] and classified [25][26][27] using TS imaging. Commonly, VS imaging has been used for modeling facial expressions, and associated robust facial recognition techniques have been developed [28][29][30]. However, from our understanding, the literature has not developed computational models for stress recognition using both TS and VS imaging together as yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, facial expressions have been analyzed [24] and classified [25][26][27] using TS imaging. Commonly, VS imaging has been used for modeling facial expressions, and associated robust facial recognition techniques have been developed [28][29][30]. However, from our understanding, the literature has not developed computational models for stress recognition using both TS and VS imaging together as yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent advances of 3D/4D sensors based on two main technologies -stereo-photogrammetry and structured-light -opened the doors to develop approaches for analyzing static (3D) and dynamic (4D) shapes. In particular, targeting the face recognition or expression classification problems, few groups have recently collected new datasets (Sun and Yin, 2008) (Zhang et al, 2014) (Cosker et al, 2011) and have developed first techniques (Sun et al, 2010) (Sandbach et al, 2012) (Ben Amor et al, 2014) for expression recognition from 3D sequences. These approaches have demonstrated the role of 3D dynamic faces analysis to reveal deformations hidden in 2D videos.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in comparing shapes of faces, it is important that similar biological parts are registered to each other, in particular the left and right halves of the face, when studying the face asymmetry. Several methods have been proposed in the literature as discussed above such as the Non-rigid ICP algorithm (Cheng et al, 2015), the Free Form Deformation (FFD) algorithm (Sandbach et al, 2012) and the Thin-plate Spline (TPS) algorithm (Fang et al, 2012). Most of these solutions try to find an optimal registration between two 3D faces, however, their cost functions which minimize the distance between 3D meshes is not a proper metric; it is not even symmetric.…”
Section: Pre-processing Of 3d Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have presented methods for automatic recognition of emotions from videos. For recognizing emotions using BU4DFE, a method was proposed using Iterative Closest Point (ICP), Free Form Deformation (FFD), vector projections and Hidden Markov Model [1]. An emotional avatar image concept using FERA 2011 database has been developed in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%