2010
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal peer tutoring and repeated reading: Increasing practicality using student groups

Abstract: Previous research has investigated the efÞcacy of peer-mediated repeated reading (RR) interventions carried out by student dyads. This research extends the existing research by investigating the impact of RR on oral reading ßuency and comprehension when carried out by a teacher in small groups of fourth-grade students. Outcomes were analyzed using a multiple baseline single case design across groups in addition to supplementary analyses (dual level and trend criteria, percentage of non-overlapping data, class … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(28 reference statements)
3
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While performing this task, learners are regularly requested to orally imitate or subvocalize the instructor's reading or recording, either in real time or with a time lapse. This is repeated until a manifest growth in reading speed is observed (Therrien, 2004) or a predetermined performance criterion is attained (Oddo, Barnett, Hawkins, & Musti-Rao, 2010;Samuels, 1979).…”
Section: Dual-modality Input In Repeated Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While performing this task, learners are regularly requested to orally imitate or subvocalize the instructor's reading or recording, either in real time or with a time lapse. This is repeated until a manifest growth in reading speed is observed (Therrien, 2004) or a predetermined performance criterion is attained (Oddo, Barnett, Hawkins, & Musti-Rao, 2010;Samuels, 1979).…”
Section: Dual-modality Input In Repeated Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adrian and Miguel increased their reading fluency when repeated reading was combined with vocabulary instruction with effect sizes ranging from 1.47 -3.20. These findings are also consistent with findings for EO students when vocabulary instruction was added to a repeated reading intervention (ES range 0.96 -2.23; Hawkins et al, 2010). These findings are also consistent with previous findings that some ELLs increased fluency more when vocabulary instruction was added while others did not see an additional increase with vocabulary instruction (Malloy et al, 2006).…”
Section: Fluencysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Maze. In order to estimate comprehension gains on the instructional passages, performance on maze probes was used, the same passages used for OPR were used for Maze (Oddo, Barnett, Hawkins, & Musti-Rao, 2010). After the passages were selected they were modified to create Maze passages.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, peer tutoring is effective for trainees with and without disabilities, native English-speaking students, and English language learners (Okilwa & Shelby, 2010). The positive effects of peer tutoring have been demonstrated across subjects such as reading (Oddo, Barnett, Hawkins, & Musti-Rao, 2010), math (Hawkins, Musti-Rao, Hughes, Berry, & McGuire, 2009), social studies (Lo & Cartledge, 2004), and science (Bowman-Perrott, Greenwood, & Tapia, 2007). Findings suggest that peer tutoring is an effective intervention, regardless of dosage, grade level, or disability status.…”
Section: Peer Tutoringmentioning
confidence: 91%