2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac27d2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in 3D printing piezoelectric materials for biomedical applications

Abstract: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has attracted significant attention for fabricating piezoelectric materials due to its high efficiency and capability to produce complex structures. Motivated by the desire to address limitations in conventional methods for fabricating piezoelectric materials, this review first introduces commonly used 3D-printing technologies to fabricate piezoelectric materials. The advantages of the technologies are evaluated. Subsequently, typical piezoelectric materials produced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a solid model of the proposed design, the structure was expanded with a thickness ( t ) for in-plane and out-of-plane directions that was fixed at 200 μm. The thickness of the structure was selected according to the acceptable range of thickness reported in recent piezoelectric 3D printing studies, which was in a range from 100 μm to several millimeters . The θ range was specified between −30° and 30°, which was defined as a controllable parameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To obtain a solid model of the proposed design, the structure was expanded with a thickness ( t ) for in-plane and out-of-plane directions that was fixed at 200 μm. The thickness of the structure was selected according to the acceptable range of thickness reported in recent piezoelectric 3D printing studies, which was in a range from 100 μm to several millimeters . The θ range was specified between −30° and 30°, which was defined as a controllable parameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the structure was selected according to the acceptable range of thickness reported in recent piezoelectric 3D printing studies, which was in a range from 100 μm to several millimeters. 25 The θ range was specified between −30°and 30°, which was defined as a controllable parameter. According to constant parameters of piezoelectric metamaterial, θ more than 30°or less than −30°leads to a closed unit cell, which was not desirable for the design.…”
Section: Geometries and Materials Properties 211 Piezoelectricmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[146] The 3Dprinted high-performance piezoelectric materials hold substantial potential for a wide range of applications, such as sensors, energy harvesting, and medical devices. [146,147] Zhou's groups have reported several interesting works on 3D printed ultrasound transducers for biomedical applications, [148] including BaTiO 3 piezoceramic (d 33 = 160 pC N −1 and k t = 0.47) for ultrasonic focusing imaging on the porcine eyeball, [149] BaTiO 3 with honeycomb structure (d 33 = 60 pC N −1 and k t = 0.31) to avoid the dicing-filling method, [150] and lithium niobate helical-like config-uration for microparticle manipulation. [151] For example, the 3Dprinted dense piezoelectric elements achieve high piezoelectric properties (d 33 = 583 pC N −1 and k t = 0.57) and complex architectures for localized cavitation (Figure 4h-j).…”
Section: D Printed Piezoelectricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each 3D printing technique has different characteristics and application scenarios. 36 For example, i3DP has good resolution and biocompatibility, and can be used to prepare microfluidic devices. 37,38 FDM is fast and low-cost, and often used to prepare device supports and housings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%