Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength

Bruschi-Alonso, Renata Camila; Alonso, Roberta Caroline Bruschi; Correr, Gisele Maria; Alves, Marcelo Corrêa; Lewgoy, Hugo Roberto; Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho; Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria; Correr-Sobrinho, Lourenço

doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00906.x

Cited by 54 publications

(104 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The fragment was reattached and Internal dentinal groove strength [5]. Bruschi-Alonso et al, concluded that no technique or material, when it was used individually, was capable of achieving the mechanical strength of sound teeth, and they observed that circumferential chamfer was superior to direct bonding [11].…”

Section: Technique 4 : Internal Dentinal Groovementioning

confidence: 99%

In-vitro Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Re-Attachment Techniques

Abdulkhayum

Munjal²,

Babaji³

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Technique 4 : Internal Dentinal Groovementioning

confidence: 99%

In-vitro Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Re-Attachment Techniques

Abdulkhayum

Munjal²,

Babaji³

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although studies indicate that teeth restored with a full coverage restoration would provide a more mechanically stable outcome when compared with reattachment technique with the rebonded fractured tooth not being as strong also as the intact natural tooth4 11; it has been found that most failures of reattached teeth result due to new trauma 4. As far as the impact strength of the reattached fragment is concerned, it is mainly determined by the reattachment technique with circumferential chamfer technique showing better results than direct bonding technique 12. Moreover, most flaws of reattached teeth occur due to new trauma 4…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Allogenous tooth fragment reattachment

Maitin

Rastogi

et al. 2013

Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coronal fractures of the anterior teeth are a common form of dental trauma and its sequelae may impair the establishment and accomplishment of an adequate treatment plan. Among the various treatment options, reattachment of a crown fragment obtained from a previously extracted tooth is a conservative treatment that should be considered for crown fractures of anterior teeth. This article reports reattachment of an allogenous tooth fragment in a fractured maxillary lateral incisor in a 38-year-old patient. It is suggested that allogenous reattachment in a fractured anterior tooth serves to be a better alternative and should be further researched. Aesthetic and functional rehabilitation of a fractured complicated anterior crown using allogenous tooth fragment is a better alternative to other more conventional treatment options.

show abstract

“…The use of a variety of materials as bonding agents is advocated (77)(78)(79)(80). Hydrophilic adhesive agents with light cured/dual cured resin cement (12), bonding agents with flowable resins, hybrid or microfilled resin composites (7,69,(81)(82)(83), dentine adhesives with or without unfilled resins (84), dual or self-cured luting cements (75), light-cured luting cement (85), and self-etch adhesives with microhybrid composites (66) have been used with varying results (76). Developments in adhesive dentistry have improved the outcome by facilitating ultraconservative preparation techniques, and allowing "biologic restoration" (12), thus improving the esthetic outcome by retaining natural translucency and surface texture and reducing cost and chair time while increasing patient acceptance (12,66,76,86,87).…”

Section: Discussion and Treatment Optionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A proposal for classification of tooth fractures based on treatment need

Loomba

Bains

et al. 2010

J Oral Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accuracy in defining a disease makes iteasier to study and understand. Similarly, with injuries to the teeth, a comprehensive classification is an aid to correct diagnosis and treatment planning. A thorough review of various classifications of tooth fractures shows that, despite an emphasis on traumatic dental injuries, a consensus needs to be arrived at, especially among clinicians and general/family dentists. The ideal classification would be applicable to both primary and permanent dentition, based on tooth fractures in both the horizontal and vertical planes, encompassing all possible sites, easy to comprehend, communicable amongst health professionals and clinically relevant. With recent improvements in conservative techniques, it is now clinically possible to preserve natural teeth even if they have been horizontally or vertically fractured, and thus an in-depth understanding and knowledge of tooth fractures, together with a simplified classification, is now more than ever essential. (J Oral Sci 52, 517-529, 2010)

show abstract

Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength

Cited by 54 publications

References 16 publications

In-vitro Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Re-Attachment Techniques

In-vitro Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Re-Attachment Techniques

Allogenous tooth fragment reattachment

A proposal for classification of tooth fractures based on treatment need

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About