2018
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for Reperfusion Failures in Stent-Retriever-Based Thrombectomy: Registry Analysis and Proposal of a Classification System

Abstract: Reasons for reperfusion failure in stent-retriever thrombectomy are heterogeneous. The failure to establish intracranial or cervical access is almost as common as stent-retriever failure after establishing intracranial access. Systematic reporting standards of reasons may help to further estimate relative frequencies and thereby guide priorities for technical development and scientific effort.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several retrospective investigations concerning failing thrombectomy were published in recent months [13,14]. In our study, we were able to detect success rates of 83.2% at our center.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several retrospective investigations concerning failing thrombectomy were published in recent months [13,14]. In our study, we were able to detect success rates of 83.2% at our center.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A major problem when comparing different studies is the heterogeneous definition of success. In particular, a reperfusion result of mTICI 2a is sometimes regarded as success, sometimes as failure [6,13,14,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trial and observational evidence suggests that there is a technical failure rate (TICI 0–2a) of 14–41% whether using a stent retriever and balloon guide catheter, distal aspiration catheter, or a combination of techniques 1–12. As well as intracranial access failure, thrombus extraction failure is responsible in approximately 40% of unsuccessful procedures 16. The natural history of non-recanalized ELVO stroke is poor,35 and equally, those patients suffering procedural failure commonly fair poorly also.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of factors impact on technical success, including intracranial access failure and thrombus extraction failure. The latter has been shown to be responsible for nearly half of unsuccessful procedures 16. Multiple variables are likely to govern device–thrombus interaction17 but patient factors associated with thrombectomy failure include fibrin rich18 or calcific emboli,19 intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD),20 and vessel morphology 21…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median NIHSS score on admission was 16 (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The median mRS score at day 90 was 6 (4)(5)(6). A good clinical outcome was observed in only 3 patients (5.7%).…”
Section: Early Termination Vs Multiple Reperfusion Attemptsmentioning
confidence: 95%