2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0375-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for encounter in young people consulting a family doctor in the French speaking part of Switzerland: a cross sectional study

Abstract: BackgroundKnowledge of patient’s reasons for encounter is useful to inform health service planning and health professional education. Our aim was to describe reasons for encounter as stated by an unselected group of young people attending primary care practices in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.MethodsConsecutive patients aged between 15 and 24 years were recruited as part of the PRISM-Ado trial (n = 594). They completed an anonymous questionnaire in the waiting room, including their main reason for e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were not filtered, and the quantity and diversity of sites increased the external validity of the study. Moreover, the proportion of psychological reasons for consultation (8.9%) was similar to the stable proportion (8%) found in other studies (Meynard, Broers, Lefebvre, Narring, & Haller, ; Tudrej et al, ), thus adding value to our recruitment method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They were not filtered, and the quantity and diversity of sites increased the external validity of the study. Moreover, the proportion of psychological reasons for consultation (8.9%) was similar to the stable proportion (8%) found in other studies (Meynard, Broers, Lefebvre, Narring, & Haller, ; Tudrej et al, ), thus adding value to our recruitment method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The RFEs were coded using the International Classification of Primary Care, second edition (ICPC-2), which is commonly used in primary care settings [ 21 , 22 ]. This standardized classification is based on codes that are classified in 17 chapters representing body systems and problem areas [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RFEs was coded using the International Classi cation of Primary Care, second edition (ICPC-2), which was usually used in primary care settings [18,19]. This standardized classi cation is based on codes that are classi ed in 17 chapters representing body systems and problem areas [20].…”
Section: Data Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%