2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realizing 17.0% external quantum efficiency in red quantum dot light-emitting diodes by pursuing the ideal inkjet-printed film and interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, various QD patterning methods have been proposed, such as electro‐hydrodynamic jet printing, [ 11–14 ] transfer printing, [ 15–17 ] and inkjet printing. [ 18–26 ] Among these techniques, inkjet printing is highly advantageous for the implementation of full‐color QLED displays because of its fast processing time, comparatively straightforward quality that causes a minimal material usage by the drop‐on‐demand (DOD) process with high precision and accuracy, [ 18 ] and ability to be used in large‐area displays because it does not require an individual fine metal mask for RGB colors. Despite these advantages, the performance of inkjet‐printed devices is generally lower than that of spin‐coated devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, various QD patterning methods have been proposed, such as electro‐hydrodynamic jet printing, [ 11–14 ] transfer printing, [ 15–17 ] and inkjet printing. [ 18–26 ] Among these techniques, inkjet printing is highly advantageous for the implementation of full‐color QLED displays because of its fast processing time, comparatively straightforward quality that causes a minimal material usage by the drop‐on‐demand (DOD) process with high precision and accuracy, [ 18 ] and ability to be used in large‐area displays because it does not require an individual fine metal mask for RGB colors. Despite these advantages, the performance of inkjet‐printed devices is generally lower than that of spin‐coated devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a number of researches focus on finding ways to improve the uniformity of inkjet‐printed films. [ 18–26 ] Moreover, the depositing morphologies of the inkjet droplets affect the efficiency, stability, and performance of the inkjet‐printed devices. In order to control this phenomenon, a widely used method in controlling the drying conditions of a droplet is employed using cosolvents, [ 11,19–26 ] mixing surfactants, [ 27–29 ] and/or fine‐tuning viscosity, [ 30–32 ] which optimized the Marangoni flow and capillary flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23,25,26 ] For this issue, it has been reported that mixtures of low vapor pressure and high vapor pressure solvents like alkane solvent and phenyl‐cyclohexane (CHB) can suppress the coffee ring effect, which has been widely used in IJP ‐QLED. [ 14,17,26 ] A greater solvent evaporation flux can weaken the coffee ring effect to form a more uniform layer. [ 21,28 ] Therefore, the post‐treatment after IJP also plays a pivotal role in forming a uniform QD layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inkjet printing [ 11,12 ] is a mask‐free, material‐effective, and large‐area compatible manufacturing technology, and it has been considered to be appropriate for large‐scale production of QLED displays. [ 13–15 ] However, traditional inkjet printing only meets the demand of television display with pixel density of about 100 pixels per in. (PPI), rather than mobile phones which require high‐resolution pixels over 300 PPI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%