2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.253601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization of Anomalous Floquet Insulators in Strongly Coupled Nanophotonic Lattices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The wave propagation in the infinite network can be described by a Bloch eigenproblem, which considers the scattering at the nodes, described by a 6 × 6 unitary matrix S(k), and also involves the bidirectional phase delay φ induced by the links: So far, topological unitary scattering wave networks 6,30-34 have only been implemented in reciprocal systems 7,[35][36][37] exploiting two time-reversed subspaces that are never genuinely decoupled. On the contrary, our non-reciprocal scattering network is formally analogous to a rigorously oriented kagome graph (see Supplementary Information), described by a unitary matrix 33 S(k), which can be mapped 38 onto the Floquet eigenproblem of a periodically driven lattice [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] , with the angle variable φ taking the role of the quasi-energy.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The wave propagation in the infinite network can be described by a Bloch eigenproblem, which considers the scattering at the nodes, described by a 6 × 6 unitary matrix S(k), and also involves the bidirectional phase delay φ induced by the links: So far, topological unitary scattering wave networks 6,30-34 have only been implemented in reciprocal systems 7,[35][36][37] exploiting two time-reversed subspaces that are never genuinely decoupled. On the contrary, our non-reciprocal scattering network is formally analogous to a rigorously oriented kagome graph (see Supplementary Information), described by a unitary matrix 33 S(k), which can be mapped 38 onto the Floquet eigenproblem of a periodically driven lattice [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] , with the angle variable φ taking the role of the quasi-energy.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference is that the low-reflection case has edge modes in every quasi-energy bandgap, whereas at high reflection, they are found only in bandgaps of type 1. This low-|R| behaviour is the hallmark of anomalous Floquet insulators 33,35,42,45 (AFI), which possess topological edge states despite the Chern number of all surrounding bands being zero. In contrast, the high-reflection case corresponds to the Chern insulator (CI).…”
Section: Chern and Anomalous Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomalous Floquet topological phase was scaled up to telecom wavelengths by Afzal et al [83] using the silicon photonic resonator lattice shown in Figure 4. The main distinguishing feature compared to previous observations of quantum Hall edge states is the presence of edge states in all of the array's band gaps.…”
Section: Topological Coupled Resonator Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key advantages of this experimental platform is the possibility of imaging the excited energies during the dynamics, allowing a direct observation of the linear and nonlinear lattice spectrum [17]. Another -completely -different photonic lattice setup consists of coupled octagon resonators, which strongly couple to each other forming nanophotonic lattice structures [18]. There, every unit cell is formed by several resonators, allowing the emulation of periodically driven systems and the study of associated topological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%