2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world experience of leadless left ventricular endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter international registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system

Abstract: Background Biventricular endocardial pacing (BiV ENDO) is a therapy for heart failure patients who cannot receive transvenous epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or have not responded adequately to CRT. BiV ENDO CRT can be delivered by a new wireless LV ENDO pacing system (WiSE-CRT system; EBR Systems, Sunnyvale, CA), without the requirement for lifelong anticoagulation. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the WiSE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The LV receiver electrode is fully endothelialized after four weeks, avoiding the need for long-term anticoagulation [67]. In a multicenter registry of 90 patients implanted with the WiSE-CRT system, successful implantation and CRT delivery was achieved in 94.4% of patients, while 70% of patients experienced an improvement in heart failure symptoms [68]. Montemerlo et al presented a case of fully leadless resynchronization therapy delivered trans-septally with a combination of Micra™ and WiSE-CRT™ systems [69].…”
Section: Cieds In a Patient On Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LV receiver electrode is fully endothelialized after four weeks, avoiding the need for long-term anticoagulation [67]. In a multicenter registry of 90 patients implanted with the WiSE-CRT system, successful implantation and CRT delivery was achieved in 94.4% of patients, while 70% of patients experienced an improvement in heart failure symptoms [68]. Montemerlo et al presented a case of fully leadless resynchronization therapy delivered trans-septally with a combination of Micra™ and WiSE-CRT™ systems [69].…”
Section: Cieds In a Patient On Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of successful implantation and effective CRT pacing were high (97.1%), with a substantial improvement (84.8%) in the clinical composite score at 6 months; however, the rate of early serious complications was 31.5% at 1-month postprocedure follow-up (8.6% within 24 hours and 22.9% between 24 hours and 1 month). 49 According to recent data from a Multicenter International Registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system, 50 implantation of the device was feasible in 94.4% of patients and 70% of those reported improvement in of HF symptoms. Complication rates differed among the centers: 4.4%, 18.8%, and 6.7% within <24 hours, 1-30 days, and 1-6 months, respectively.…”
Section: Wireless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complication rates differed among the centers: 4.4%, 18.8%, and 6.7% within <24 hours, 1-30 days, and 1-6 months, respectively. 50 Likewise, the SOLVE-CRT trial 51 is an ongoing RCT assessing the safety and effectiveness of the WiSE-CRT in nonresponders to traditional CRT.…”
Section: Wireless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system still has multiple caveats, including: (1) the need for an endovascular ICD lead; (2) dependence on acoustic window, necessitating alignment of the LV electrode and the subcutaneous transmitter that is not always feasible; (3) long-term use of ultrasound energy which may have unintended adverse effects on myocardial tissue and might be exposed to external interference; and, (4) potential emboli of the LV electrode resulting in stroke. An international registry evaluating the efficacy and safety of the WISE-CRT pacing system was just recently published [ 57 ]. The registry included 90 patients who either failed or could not undergo a conventional trans-venous CRT implant, due to no venous access or anatomic constrains.…”
Section: Multi-component Leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Pacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registry included 90 patients who either failed or could not undergo a conventional trans-venous CRT implant, due to no venous access or anatomic constrains. The registry revealed high implant success rate (94%), but with a very high six-month complication rate (24%), including: two patients with acute cardiac perforation, two patients with acute lung injury, four deaths of whom three were considered procedure-related, one stroke, three patients with infection, and four patients with arterial bleeding [ 57 ].…”
Section: Multi-component Leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Pacingmentioning
confidence: 99%