2008 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icves.2008.4640906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time road signs classification

Abstract: Abstract-This paper describes a method for classifying road signs based on a single color camera mounted on a moving vehicle. The main focus will be on the final neural network based classification stage of the candidates provided by an existing traffic sign detection algorithm. Great attention is paid to image preprocessing in order to provide a more simple and clear input to the network: candidate color images are cropped and converted to greyscale, then enhanced using a contrast stretching technique; a mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is certified, by examining By comparing our results to some already developed methods for automatic road-sign detection and recognition, the proposed technique ensures better detection and classification rates, in most of the examined cases. For example, in Barnes and Zelinsky (2004) the detection accuracy was 90% and the classification accuracy 75%; in Shneier (2005) the rates were 88% and 78% respectively; and in Medici et al (2008) the rates were 74% and 89.1%. Concerning the proposed methodology and especially during the categorization procedure, HOG descriptors are integrated, which lead to very satisfactory results, when compared to ordinary classification procedures.…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is certified, by examining By comparing our results to some already developed methods for automatic road-sign detection and recognition, the proposed technique ensures better detection and classification rates, in most of the examined cases. For example, in Barnes and Zelinsky (2004) the detection accuracy was 90% and the classification accuracy 75%; in Shneier (2005) the rates were 88% and 78% respectively; and in Medici et al (2008) the rates were 74% and 89.1%. Concerning the proposed methodology and especially during the categorization procedure, HOG descriptors are integrated, which lead to very satisfactory results, when compared to ordinary classification procedures.…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Medici (2008) multi-layer, feedforward neural networks have been trained, through the backpropagation algorithm, and the images were described by the illumination values. Similar publications using NN for the recognition stage are Nguwi and Kouzani (2008) and Eichner and Breckon (2008).…”
Section: Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is also prevailing for the task of traffic sign recognition. In [60], six Neural Networks have been trained with the back propagation method for six different classes of road signs. Their proposed algorithm was tested on 200 different traffic signs.…”
Section: Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many road sign recognition systems use Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in the classification process ( [5], [6], [15], [16], [17]). Template matching using cross correlation is also used to identify road sign objects ( [4], [8], [18], [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%