2008
DOI: 10.1002/met.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐time monitoring of weather radar antenna pointing using digital terrain elevation and a Bayes clutter classifier

Abstract: This paper presents a novel technique to monitor continuously the azimuthal pointing accuracy of a weather radar antenna. The technique consists of cross-correlating between modelled and measured echoes from ground clutter in real-time at low elevation angles under precipitation and non-precipitation conditions. The azimuthal angle lag with the maximum cross-correlation indicates the adjustment needed in antenna pointing. The modelled ground clutter echoes were obtained using high-resolution digital elevation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the differences in velocity, a block of precipitation is found within box a of Figure , two wind farms in box b, and wind farms in box c surrounded by sea clutter displaying negative velocities of about 1.25 m s −1 . This is an unusual case with sea clutter in this region due to adverse anomalous propagation conditions, as modelling has shown the beam would not normally be hitting the water even at 0.3° (Rico‐Ramirez et al , ). These near‐zero measurements could be due to having multiple wind turbines within each pixel, as beyond 50 km the pixels are broad enough to contain between 1 and 3 turbines.…”
Section: Classifying Wind‐farm Cluttermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To illustrate the differences in velocity, a block of precipitation is found within box a of Figure , two wind farms in box b, and wind farms in box c surrounded by sea clutter displaying negative velocities of about 1.25 m s −1 . This is an unusual case with sea clutter in this region due to adverse anomalous propagation conditions, as modelling has shown the beam would not normally be hitting the water even at 0.3° (Rico‐Ramirez et al , ). These near‐zero measurements could be due to having multiple wind turbines within each pixel, as beyond 50 km the pixels are broad enough to contain between 1 and 3 turbines.…”
Section: Classifying Wind‐farm Cluttermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Z DR 'column' has also been reported with its coincidence to thunderstorm updrafts (Loney et al, 2002;Snyder et al, 2013). Another capability of Z DR is that it can provide significant information of clutter echoes through the use of its texture (Friedrich et al, 2009;Rico-Ramirez et al, 2009). Although Z DR is independent of radar concentration, because Z DR is a product of Z H and Z V , the bias in Z DR may be introduced due to the mismatch between the horizontal (H) and vertical (V) channels (Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Differential Reflectivity (Z Dr )mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The elevations used in the comparisons were 0.2 • and 0.7 • for the Thurnham radar and 1 • for the Chenies radar. Rays affected by partial beam blocking were identified and discarded from the analysis using the clutter predictor described in [24].…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%