Real-Time (iOCT) Guided Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Using a Novel Forceps with Laser-Ablated Microstructure Tip Surface

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated intraoperative OCT (iOCT)—guided epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal using a novel forceps with a laser-ablated tip surface; it was designed to help prevent indentation force, shear stress, or tractional trauma when grasping very fine membranes. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent 23- and 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for vitreoretinal interface disorders. ERM and ILM peeling was performed under guidance with microscope-integrated iOCT using novel ILM forceps with laser-ablated tip surfaces. These forceps were engineered to enhance friction when grasping tissue. Evaluation of ERM/ILM manipulation included postoperative slow-motion video analysis of the number of grasping attempts, initial ILM mobilization, and observed damage to retinal tissue. Results: ERM/ILM removal was successfully performed in all patients, with an average of four grasp actions to initial membrane mobilization (91%). Additional use of a diamond-dusted membrane scraper was used in two cases (9%). Mean best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) logMAR improved from 0.5 ± 0.34 to 0.33 ± 0.36 (p = 0.05) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) improved from 462 ± 146 µm to 359 ± 78 µm (p = 0.002). Postoperative iOCT video analysis demonstrated hyper-reflectivity of the inner retinal layers associated with retinal hemorrhage in five eyes (22%), but no grasping-related retinal breaks. Conclusions: The texturized surface on the tips of the ILM forceps were found to be helpful for mobilizing ILM edges from the retinal surface. iOCT-guided ERM surgery also allowed for improved intraoperative tissue visualization. We believe that these two technologies helped reduce both unnecessary surgical maneuvers and retinal damage.

Clinical significance of signal shadowing during intraoperative optical coherence tomography-assisted vitreoretinal surgery

“…This small dimension was interpreted by our study group to be clinically irrelevant because the outline of the underlying tissue could still be easily identified 20 . This was also the approach taken by several studies that developed similar analytical interpretations or adopted such benchmarks in their study design 2 , 7 . Yet, this discrepancy prompts the need to establish objective criteria that determine what a clinically relevant interference is, to create a standard unitary interpretation that could ensure analysis reproductivity and enhance the compatibility of future references of the data.…”