2023
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12071214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Life Experience of Continuously Infused Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Patients with Bronchiectasis and Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in the Outpatient Setting

Francesco Venuti,
Alberto Gaviraghi,
Amedeo De Nicolò
et al.

Abstract: (1) Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor with excellent activity against the multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Continuous infusion (CI) dosing allows the optimization of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of β-lactam antibiotics and may support patients’ treatment as outpatients. (2) Methods: Adult patients receiving their entire course of C/T as a CI in the outpatient setting were retrospectively included in the study. The primary outcom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While C/T has received approval for several pathologies caused by Gram-negative pathogens, it is most commonly referred to as a viable treatment alternative for MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Resistance patterns to C/T, as to most antimicrobials, vary from country to country, but recently published studies report effectiveness in more than 75% of cases (Venuti et al, 2023;Karlowsky et al, 2024;Mendes Pedro et al, 2024). However, a 2023 multicenter study focusing on various infections caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HAP, VAP, wound infections, UTI, IAI, catheter-related BSI) showcases that C/T does not provide significant differences regarding clinical outcome, when compared to CZA (Almangour et al, 2023).…”
Section: Ceftolozane/tazobactammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While C/T has received approval for several pathologies caused by Gram-negative pathogens, it is most commonly referred to as a viable treatment alternative for MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Resistance patterns to C/T, as to most antimicrobials, vary from country to country, but recently published studies report effectiveness in more than 75% of cases (Venuti et al, 2023;Karlowsky et al, 2024;Mendes Pedro et al, 2024). However, a 2023 multicenter study focusing on various infections caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HAP, VAP, wound infections, UTI, IAI, catheter-related BSI) showcases that C/T does not provide significant differences regarding clinical outcome, when compared to CZA (Almangour et al, 2023).…”
Section: Ceftolozane/tazobactammentioning
confidence: 99%