2020
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01102-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-life data on the efficacy and safety of erenumab in the Abruzzo region, central Italy

Abstract: Background: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody inhibiting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CGRPr), for the prevention of migraine in a real-life setting. Main body: We included in our observational study all patients with episodic or chronic migraine treated with erenumab during the year 2019 in the Abruzzo region, central Italy, and with a 6-month follow-up. We included 89 patients; 76 (85.4%) received 6 doses of erenumab, 11 (12.4%) autonomo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

28
138
4
22

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
28
138
4
22
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing so, however, this may have inadvertently diminished the potential clinical value of assessing the impact of a treatment on the combination of frequency, severity, and duration of pain associated with migraine that may be more closely associated with the patient's overall pain experience [19,20]. Moreover, other "real-world" assessments of migraine include a variety of patient-reported outcomes (e.g., disability and quality of life) to fully assess the potential bene t of migraine treatment strategies [21,22]. Total pain burden may better re ect what clinicians and patients discuss regarding the individual's pain experience and could prove useful to further patient-centric discussions regarding treatment expectations when clinicians are evaluating options for migraine prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, however, this may have inadvertently diminished the potential clinical value of assessing the impact of a treatment on the combination of frequency, severity, and duration of pain associated with migraine that may be more closely associated with the patient's overall pain experience [19,20]. Moreover, other "real-world" assessments of migraine include a variety of patient-reported outcomes (e.g., disability and quality of life) to fully assess the potential bene t of migraine treatment strategies [21,22]. Total pain burden may better re ect what clinicians and patients discuss regarding the individual's pain experience and could prove useful to further patient-centric discussions regarding treatment expectations when clinicians are evaluating options for migraine prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials were only performed in migraine patients who had failed up to four prophylactic medications in the past. [2][3][4] Although there are indications of good effectiveness under real-world conditions 5,6 , data on highly therapy-refractory patients that had failed more than four prophylactic treatments are missing, yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monoclonal antibodies directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (CGRPr) are migraine-speci c treatments whose e cacy and safety were proven in both EM and CM [2][3][4][5]. However, the available real-life studies show that most patients treated in common clinical practice have CM [6][7][8][9][10]. In the present real-life, multicenter study, we assessed the rate and possible predictors of conversion from CM to EM in patients treated with erenumab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%