2018
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-018-1269-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials: RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
94
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The best correlation is calculated between the R3 test heat and 2 d compressive strength with an R² of 0.95, followed by the method taken from Snellings and Scrivener (2016) with an R² of 0.92. These R² values are similar to the correlation coefficients observed for calcined clay reactivity and 28d compressive strength of various SCMs[19,22]. Goodness of fit is progressively degrading towards higher and lower ages.Only the method taken from Kashani et al 2014 shows a better fit for 91 d old samples than for 28 d and d old samples[29].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The best correlation is calculated between the R3 test heat and 2 d compressive strength with an R² of 0.95, followed by the method taken from Snellings and Scrivener (2016) with an R² of 0.92. These R² values are similar to the correlation coefficients observed for calcined clay reactivity and 28d compressive strength of various SCMs[19,22]. Goodness of fit is progressively degrading towards higher and lower ages.Only the method taken from Kashani et al 2014 shows a better fit for 91 d old samples than for 28 d and d old samples[29].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the first test using 6 selected GGBS, the two protocols using Ca(OH) 2 addition at 40°C showed the best correlation with 2 d compressive strength values (Table 6). We chose the R3 method based on Avet et al, (2016) and Li et al, (2018) for further investigation as sample handling was much easier due to higher l/s ratio and for higher absolute heat values and larger relative differences between samples [19,22].…”
Section: Probing Into Reactivity Using Isothermal Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations