Governance of Innovation 2010
DOI: 10.4337/9781781000830.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-inventing Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies a changing role of policy making which exceeds the direct promotion of investments in research and development and requires much more co-ordination, orientation, facilitation of self-organisation, and the promotion of interdisciplinary approaches. Such a policy is in line with arguments based on the systems theory which call for a high level of participation for co-designing and the shaping of technological development, also triggered by constructing common visions for the future development (Weber, 2005;Joly et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This implies a changing role of policy making which exceeds the direct promotion of investments in research and development and requires much more co-ordination, orientation, facilitation of self-organisation, and the promotion of interdisciplinary approaches. Such a policy is in line with arguments based on the systems theory which call for a high level of participation for co-designing and the shaping of technological development, also triggered by constructing common visions for the future development (Weber, 2005;Joly et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Nevertheless, geoengineering has, despite myriad uncertainties about its doability and desirability, rapidly acquired a deterministic frame, based on the assumption that it is ‘cheap’ and ‘easy’. Following the pattern of what Joly and colleagues ( 2010 ) call the ‘economics of techno-scientific promises’, geoengineering has been naturalised by its researchers, treated as a thing in the world to be understood rather than a highly controversial, highly speculative set of technological fix proposals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, innovation studies identified these dynamics as characteristic of innovative devices. In line with the work of Joly (2013) on the economy of technoscientific promises, or Flichy (2003) on imaginaries of innovation, or Rajan (2012) on promise as a symptom of technoscientific capitalism (Flichy, 2003;Joly, Rip, & Callon, 2013;Rajan, 2012), our analysis brings out a clear 'promising communication' at stake in mHealth discourses (Quet, 2012). All those promises contribute to promote the mobile phone as a 'simply brilliant' innovation for health.…”
Section: More Than Just a Phone?mentioning
confidence: 60%