2016
DOI: 10.1080/0376835x.2016.1179105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-estimating gender differences in income in South Africa: The implications of equivalence scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparatively, women also had low access to farm inputs such as fertilizers, improved seeds, and irrigation, as revealed by the study. Low-income levels and multiple factors such as limited access to land and farm inputs are considered a threat to women's ability to adapt to climate change risks compared to men (Posel et al 2016). While education levels were similar between men and women; the 70% illiteracy level recorded may have implications on behavioral changes towards acceptance and adoption of new technologies.…”
Section: Gender Distribution Of Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, women also had low access to farm inputs such as fertilizers, improved seeds, and irrigation, as revealed by the study. Low-income levels and multiple factors such as limited access to land and farm inputs are considered a threat to women's ability to adapt to climate change risks compared to men (Posel et al 2016). While education levels were similar between men and women; the 70% illiteracy level recorded may have implications on behavioral changes towards acceptance and adoption of new technologies.…”
Section: Gender Distribution Of Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deficiency impacts women more significantly than men because on average women tend to earn less than men (Bernasek & Shwiff, 2001;Fisher, 2010;Fisher et al, 2015). This is an area which is widely studied and well documented because of the current focus on the gender wage gap (Bhorat & Goga, 2013;Casale et al, 2016;Espi et al, 2019;B. Fisher et al, 2020;Kollamparambil & Razak, 2016;Mosomi, 2019;Posel & Casale, 2019).…”
Section: Differential Earningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the World Health Organization placed young child calorie requirements at 64% of an adult (Woolard & Leibbrandt, 1999). Posel et al (2016) applied a range of values, including κ = {0.5, 0.9}, separately for younger and older children, as well as ψ = {0.7, 0.9, 1}, while Posel et al (2020) estimate κ to be close to 0.9 and ψ to be close to 0.8. Our results, below, suggest that the economies of scale parameter is smaller and that the child cost is likely higher.…”
Section: Semi-parametric Budget Sharementioning
confidence: 99%