2004
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.24.12.5404-5420.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RB Reversibly Inhibits DNA Replication via Two Temporally Distinct Mechanisms

Abstract: The retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor is a critical negative regulator of cellular proliferation. Repression of E2F-dependent transcription has been implicated as the mechanism through which RB inhibits cell cycle progression. However, recent data have suggested that the direct interaction of RB with replication factors or sites of DNA synthesis may contribute to its ability to inhibit S phase. Here we show that RB does not exert a cis-acting effect on DNA replication. Furthermore, the localization of RB wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(143 reference statements)
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies from our laboratory and others, we find that inhibition of CDK2 activity does not influence the loading of MCM proteins on chromatin, nor the expression of cdt1 and cdc6, which are required for pre-RC assembly (Braden et al, 2006;Savio et al, 2006). However, inhibition of CDK2 activity does inhibit ongoing replication in S phase as determined by retention of PCNA on chromatin (Sever-Chroneos et al, 2001;Angus et al, 2004;Braden et al, 2006;Savio et al, 2006). Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that assembly of the pre-RC is independent of CDK2 activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous studies from our laboratory and others, we find that inhibition of CDK2 activity does not influence the loading of MCM proteins on chromatin, nor the expression of cdt1 and cdc6, which are required for pre-RC assembly (Braden et al, 2006;Savio et al, 2006). However, inhibition of CDK2 activity does inhibit ongoing replication in S phase as determined by retention of PCNA on chromatin (Sever-Chroneos et al, 2001;Angus et al, 2004;Braden et al, 2006;Savio et al, 2006). Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that assembly of the pre-RC is independent of CDK2 activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…for 5 min at 4 1C and the supernatant collected. Total cell extracts were harvested as previously described (Angus et al, 2004). Lysates were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).…”
Section: Biochemical Fractionation and Western Blottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disruption of PCNA activity elicited by Rb is shown to depend on E2F-mediated transcriptional repression and the ability of Rb to inhibit the expression of cyclin A has been suggested to be such an event (Sever-Chroneos et al, 2001;Angus et al, 2004). As demonstrated here, the cAMP-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis is dependent on Rb function and correlates with dissociation of PCNA from chromatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…protein levels of several E2F target genes involved in DNA replication (Angus et al, 2004). Disruption of PCNA activity elicited by Rb is shown to depend on E2F-mediated transcriptional repression and the ability of Rb to inhibit the expression of cyclin A has been suggested to be such an event (Sever-Chroneos et al, 2001;Angus et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%