2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ray optimization for size and shape optimization of truss structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the EM-MS algorithm is much better than all other methods in terms of average, standard deviation, and worst results. As it can be seen, the worst design yielded by the EM-MS algorithm is also lighter than the designs obtained by the PSO [36], BB-BC [25], RO [30], EHS [23], and SAHS [23] methods.…”
Section: A 72-bar Spatial Truss Structurementioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the EM-MS algorithm is much better than all other methods in terms of average, standard deviation, and worst results. As it can be seen, the worst design yielded by the EM-MS algorithm is also lighter than the designs obtained by the PSO [36], BB-BC [25], RO [30], EHS [23], and SAHS [23] methods.…”
Section: A 72-bar Spatial Truss Structurementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The optimum designs obtained by the EM-MS algorithm and some other previous studies reported in the literature such as the PSO [37], BB-BC [25], RO [30], EHS [23], SAHS [23], TLBO [27], and CBO [31] methods are presented in Table 8. From the comparison, it is noticed that the EM-MS algorithm gives better design as compared to the PSO [37], BB-BC [25], RO [30], EHS [23], SAHS [23], and CBO [31] , but slightly heavier design when compared with the TLBO [27] method. However, the number of structural analyses for the EM-MS algorithm is relatively less than the TLBO [27] method.…”
Section: A 72-bar Spatial Truss Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pareto optimization has been in use ever since. Different optimization algorithms and techniques are used to solve structural optimization problem, like Ray optimization [14], artificial bee colony algorithm [17], particle swarm optimization [10,13,16], genetic algorithm [11,15], ant colony optimization [12,13] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%