2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-dependent deformation of amorphous sulfide glass electrolytes for solid-state batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images in Figure demonstrate that the shapes of the original molds are well-preserved on the patterned SE surface, even after final compaction/densification. This demonstrates the benefits of using the LPSC SE in the molding process, which can easily plastically deform into the mold shape because of its relatively low yield strength. ,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The images in Figure demonstrate that the shapes of the original molds are well-preserved on the patterned SE surface, even after final compaction/densification. This demonstrates the benefits of using the LPSC SE in the molding process, which can easily plastically deform into the mold shape because of its relatively low yield strength. ,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This demonstrates the benefits of using the LPSC SE in the molding process, which can easily plastically deform into the mold shape because of its relatively low yield strength. 12,16,54 In addition to the mechanical properties of the SE, the material properties and geometric shape of the mold must also be carefully selected to survive the templating process under the applied loads. The mold material must be sufficiently stiff (elastic modulus), strong (yield strength), and tough (fracture toughness) to avoid mechanical failure during the templating process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] This behavior is likely due to the lower yield strength of sulfides, especially compared to the hard and brittle nature of oxides such as LLZO. [37,38] The ability of the SSE to locally deform to contact the current collector is an important factor in developing high-performance anode-free SSBs. We note that in contrast to LLZO, LPSC is not thermodynamically stable in contact with lithium, but the interphase layer only grows to be ≈250 nm thick.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result contrasts with the challenges of interfacing an anode-free current collector with oxides, such as LLZO, which have required hot pressing at temperatures > 900 °C to form a viable interface 12 . This behavior is likely due to the lower yield strength of sulfides, especially compared to the hard and brittle nature of oxides like LLZO 36,37 . The ability of the SSE to locally deform to contact the current collector is thus an important factor in developing high-performance anode-free SSBs.…”
Section: Lithium Deposition Behavior At Anode-free Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the active material breathing will be transferred to the solid electrolyte that will subsequently need to adapt to the local change. Sulfide solid electrolyte have interesting mechanical properties with a Young moduli around 20 GPa and generally able to manage little volume change, especially true when amorphous solid electrolyte are employed since the stress/strain cannot propagate along grains boundaries. Additionally, one should pay attention to the pressure used for cycling which is independent from the one applied for the sintering of the solid electrolyte/composite electrode. Indeed, when the sintering is properly performed in the solid electrolyte and on the composite electrode, there is no need for a strong pressure to be applied on the cell for cycling. However, the story is different when the cell stack is fully assembled and the counter electrode needs to be properly “attached” to the separator, which has a certain surface rugosity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%