2013
DOI: 10.1002/mus.23937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rasch analysis of clinical outcome measures in spinal muscular atrophy

Abstract: Introduction Trial design for SMA depends on meaningful rating scales to assess outcomes. In this study Rasch methodology was applied to 9 motor scales in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Methods Data from all 3 SMA types were provided by research groups for 9 commonly used scales. Rasch methodology assessed the ordering of response option thresholds, tests of fit, spread of item locations, residual correlations, and person separation index. Results Each scale had good reliability. However, several issues im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 This kind of analysis was recently used by Cano et al 9 for spinal muscular atrophy outcome measures. It is used here to identify some items that affect the validity of MFM-32 and introduce the minimal changes that can ensure the fit of the data to the Rasch model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 This kind of analysis was recently used by Cano et al 9 for spinal muscular atrophy outcome measures. It is used here to identify some items that affect the validity of MFM-32 and introduce the minimal changes that can ensure the fit of the data to the Rasch model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this context, the Rasch analysis, developed by Georg Rasch, 5 is a rigorous approach for an in-depth understanding of a scale’s metrological properties 69 and an evaluation of properties not analyzed by the classical test theory—for example, how well an item performs in terms of relevance or usefulness in measuring the underlying test construct, the amount of the construct targeted by each question, the possible redundancy of an item regarding other items in the scale, and the appropriateness of response categories along the entire range of disease severity. 10 The Rasch model assumes that the probability of a participant’s endorsing (ie, ability to perform) an item is a logistic function of the relative difference between the item’s location (its difficulty) and the person’s location (his or her ability).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mayhew discussed the Rasch analyses of the motor function scales in SMA [61]. She highlighted where these scales had more robust areas of strength, where gaps need to be addressed and how rescoring selected items would optimize the linearity of the scales.…”
Section: Outcome Measures -Older Scales Revisited and Newer Testing Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight of eleven were clinical responders and had a significant increase at V3 and V4 versus V0 (median ≥3 points; signed-rank test, p≤0.042, online supplementary figure 1E); this improvement was also confirmed when linearising the data, according to the Rasch analysis (p≤0.035) 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%