1992
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90194-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ras oncogene product p21 expression and prognosis of human ovarian tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results partly differ from two previous immunohistochemical studies (Rodenburg et al, 1988;Yaginuma et al, 1992) that found no correlation between p21 levels and clinical outcome but are in agreement with recent work by Katsaros et al (1995), performed by immunoblot analysis. This discrepancy may be due to the different methods employed and the use of different monoclonal antibodies -RAP-5 (Rodenburg et al, 1988) and RAP-28 (Yaginuma et al, 1992) -from the one (Y13-259) used both in our study and in that of Katsaros. RAP-5 binds to proteins of a variety of molecular weights in many different neoplastic and normal cell types, while Y13-259 does not recognize ras-related proteins and is of proven specificity to p21 ras (Robinson et al, 1986).…”
Section: Detection Of Point Mutationscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results partly differ from two previous immunohistochemical studies (Rodenburg et al, 1988;Yaginuma et al, 1992) that found no correlation between p21 levels and clinical outcome but are in agreement with recent work by Katsaros et al (1995), performed by immunoblot analysis. This discrepancy may be due to the different methods employed and the use of different monoclonal antibodies -RAP-5 (Rodenburg et al, 1988) and RAP-28 (Yaginuma et al, 1992) -from the one (Y13-259) used both in our study and in that of Katsaros. RAP-5 binds to proteins of a variety of molecular weights in many different neoplastic and normal cell types, while Y13-259 does not recognize ras-related proteins and is of proven specificity to p21 ras (Robinson et al, 1986).…”
Section: Detection Of Point Mutationscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…(1997) ras expression is inversely correlated with the expression of the NM-23 protein, which is believed to play an important role in the suppression of metastases (Scambia et al, 1996). Our results partly differ from two previous immunohistochemical studies (Rodenburg et al, 1988;Yaginuma et al, 1992) that found no correlation between p21 levels and clinical outcome but are in agreement with recent work by Katsaros et al (1995), performed by immunoblot analysis. This discrepancy may be due to the different methods employed and the use of different monoclonal antibodies -RAP-5 (Rodenburg et al, 1988) and RAP-28 (Yaginuma et al, 1992) -from the one (Y13-259) used both in our study and in that of Katsaros.…”
Section: Detection Of Point Mutationscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…A number of genetic alterations have been observed in ovarian cancer, but little is known about their prognostic role. Cmyc amplification (Baker et al, 1990;Sasano et al, 1992) or Ki-ras mutations (Yaginuma et al, 1992) are involved in a very low percentage of cases. C-erb-B2 gene amplification and/or overexpression has been demonstrated in 20-30% of ovarian malignant tumours (Kacinski et al, 1992;Fajac et al, 1995), but these alterations do not seem to be important in identifying subsets of patients with poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGF-II gene may play an important role in the growth of some tumors; in many of these tumors it is high ly expressed compared with normal tissue [7], There are indications that genomic imprinting may play a role in causing a number of diseases, although it has been reported in only a small number of embryonal tumors and lung cancers [8], In gynecologic tumors, there are no reports of genomic imprinting, although genetic altera tions have been identified, such as the activation of onco genes [9][10][11] and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes [12][13][14], This report is, therefore, the first study of genomic imprinting in gynecologic tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%