2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01328-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid, efficient and activation-neutral gene editing of polyclonal primary human resting CD4+ T cells allows complex functional analyses

Abstract: CD4+ T cells are central mediators of adaptive and innate immune responses and constitute a major reservoir for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in vivo. Detailed investigations of resting human CD4+ T cells have been precluded by the absence of efficient approaches for genetic manipulation limiting our understanding of HIV replication and restricting efforts to find a cure. Here we report a method for rapid, efficient, activation-neutral gene editing of resting, polyclonal human CD4+ T cells using optimized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, editing of up to three ISGs in one cell pool did not impact cell viability ( Figure S5A ). We did however observe a 34% reduction in the number of cells in the five-ISG KO condition, similar to a prior report that tested a six-gene KO in CD4 + T cells 54 . To assess whether multi-gene editing influences HIV infection or IFN restriction non-specifically, we compared the increase in HIV Levels with IFN for HM13 single KO cells to that of cells edited for both HM13 and the negative control B cell marker CD19 ( Figure S5B ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Notably, editing of up to three ISGs in one cell pool did not impact cell viability ( Figure S5A ). We did however observe a 34% reduction in the number of cells in the five-ISG KO condition, similar to a prior report that tested a six-gene KO in CD4 + T cells 54 . To assess whether multi-gene editing influences HIV infection or IFN restriction non-specifically, we compared the increase in HIV Levels with IFN for HM13 single KO cells to that of cells edited for both HM13 and the negative control B cell marker CD19 ( Figure S5B ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To validate if these receptors are indeed transferred from macrophages to T cells, the genes of two top transfer candidates, HLA-DRA and DC-SIGN ( Figures 1 C and 1D), were knocked out by CRISPR-Cas9 in M2 (knockout [KO] efficiency over 90%, Figure S3 A). Co-culture with M2 KOs abolished HLA-DR or DC-SIGN ( Figures 1 C, 1D, and S3 A) surface exposure on co-cultured CD4 T cells, respectively, whereas KO of HLA-DR in CD4 T cells 20 did not impact on their HLA-DR surface exposure following co-culture with HLA-DR + wild-type (WT) M2 ( Figure 1 H). These results strongly suggested the myeloid cells as the source of these surface-exposed receptors on co-cultured autologous CD4 T cells ( Figures 1 A and S1 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware that the model of stimulated CD4+ primary cells does not recapitulate the actual state of the reservoir, which is mainly comprise of resting CD4+ T cells that do not support HIV infection. As this is a limitation of the current study, we are trying to adopt a recently developed gene editing approach to lncRNAs to deplete CYTOR in this unique cell population and monitor the effects of latency kinetics without altering its activation [ 56 ]. Mechanistically, our observations show that CYTOR directly binds to the HIV promoter and enhances the phosphorylation of the Ser2 CTD of RNAPII through association with P-TEFb to activate viral gene expression (Figs 4 and 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%