2019
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid clinical mutational testing ofKRAS,BRAFandEGFR: a prospective comparative analysis of the Idylla technique with high-throughput next-generation sequencing

Abstract: AimsPrecision medicine therapy is remodelling the diagnostic landscape of cancer. The success of these new therapies is often based on the presence or absence of a specific mutation in a tumour. The Idylla platform is designed to determine the mutational status of a tumour as quickly and accurately as possible, as a rapid, accurate diagnosis is of the utmost importance for the treatment of patients. This is the first complete prospective study to investigate the robus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The platform can be easily integrated into any clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory, enabling rapid triaging for critical molecular markers. Although several publications have already documented the use of Idylla for FFPE biopsy samples, [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] descriptions of the suitability of cytology samples for this platform have remained confined to a few small, proof-of-principle studies, 46 and the corresponding performance characteristics, clinical validation, and extended clinical experience have remained largely undefined. The application to cytologic material is ideal, however, as it can easily address the issues of TAT and also provide rapid assessment in samples that are very scant and otherwise unsuitable for any other kind of testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The platform can be easily integrated into any clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory, enabling rapid triaging for critical molecular markers. Although several publications have already documented the use of Idylla for FFPE biopsy samples, [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] descriptions of the suitability of cytology samples for this platform have remained confined to a few small, proof-of-principle studies, 46 and the corresponding performance characteristics, clinical validation, and extended clinical experience have remained largely undefined. The application to cytologic material is ideal, however, as it can easily address the issues of TAT and also provide rapid assessment in samples that are very scant and otherwise unsuitable for any other kind of testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches offer shorter reporting times (<1 day), lower limits of detection (down to 1%), less-costly equipment and infrastructure, and less hands-on time, especially for recently developed platforms in which the starting material is a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded section. 70 However, the last option may not allow for the discrimination of specific mutations such as G12C. Pyrosequencing is an alternative method of sensitive mutation detection in short stretches of genomic DNA, but fewer laboratories have the requisite platform.…”
Section: State Of Kras-mutation Testing In Tissue Biopsies and Aspiratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous reports, the usefulness of kits based on real-time PCR performed in FFPE samples of different tumours was confirmed 16–22. However, records concerning GIST samples analysis are scarce and do not involve mutations in KIT and PDGFRα genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is well known that tissue fixation with formalin affects DNA yield and quality through induction of DNA crosslinking, reflected further in poor results of mutational analysis 15. However, with the more advanced kits and reagents adjusted to such demanding material, currently the mutational analysis on FFPE samples is easier and more commonly performed 16–22. Although KIT and PDGFRα mutations may be detected with the use of various molecular techniques, to date, no such report comparing different methods was provided for GIST samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%