2018
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled clinical study assessing two membranes for guided bone regeneration of peri‐implant bone defects: 3‐year results

Abstract: Both treatment modalities resulted in minor, but ongoing contour changes of the peri-implant tissues. Stable interproximal bone levels and healthy tissues can be obtained with membranes up to 3 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined mesial and distal marginal bone level changes based on 3 studies (Basler et al., ; Jung, Fenner, Hammerle, & Zitzmann, ; Ramel, Wismeijer, Hammerle, & Jung, ) at a mean follow‐up of 74 months (range 36–150) were −0.19 mm (range 0.04 to −0.61). Mesial and distal values were reported separately in one study (Jung, Halg, Thoma, & Hammerle, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Combined mesial and distal marginal bone level changes based on 3 studies (Basler et al., ; Jung, Fenner, Hammerle, & Zitzmann, ; Ramel, Wismeijer, Hammerle, & Jung, ) at a mean follow‐up of 74 months (range 36–150) were −0.19 mm (range 0.04 to −0.61). Mesial and distal values were reported separately in one study (Jung, Halg, Thoma, & Hammerle, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final PD values were reported in 4 studies (Basler et al., ; Jung et al., , ; Schwarz, Schmucker, & Becker, ) and amounted to 3.4 mm (2.4 to 3.9). PD changes amounted to 0.2 mm [36 months (Basler et al., )]. BOP at the last follow‐up (36 and 96 months, respectively) ranged between 11.0 and 48.1% (Basler et al., ; Schwarz et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each of the two membrane types (resorbable and non-resorbable) has its own pros and cons. The type of membrane does not affect the clinical outcome if the clinician carefully follows the principles of GBR 5 - 8 . Decomposition materials, generated during resorbable membrane resorption, may interfere with new bone formation and mechanical stability as a barrier membrane 9 .…”
Section: Resorbable Vs Non-resorbable Membranementioning
confidence: 99%