2000
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1874
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Triflusal and aspirin have similar efficacy in preventing further cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction, but triflusal showed a more favourable safety profile. Triflusal significantly reduced the incidence of non-fatal cerebrovascular events compared with aspirin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14) These pleiotropic beneficial aspects of triflusal would lead to better laboratory and clinical outcomes in patients treated with DES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14) These pleiotropic beneficial aspects of triflusal would lead to better laboratory and clinical outcomes in patients treated with DES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In major clinical trials, Triflusal has demonstrated efficacy similar to aspirin in the secondary prevention of ischemic episodes but with a markedly reduced risk of cerebral and systemic hemorrhage. 7 Recently, it has been demonstrated that Triflusal and HTB are potent in vitro and in vivo inhibitors of the activation of NF-B and NF-B-regulated genes. Furthermore, orally administered Triflusal is neuroprotective and downregulates NF-B, inflammatory mediators, and microglial activation in an excitotoxic (N-methyl-D-aspartate) injury model in the postnatal rat brain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, patients treated with triflusal had a lower risk of hemorrhage than those treated with ASA (14,15,42,46). Triflusal was associated with significantly fewer episodes of cerebral hemorrhage (0.3% in patients treated with triflusal vs. 1.0% in patients treated with ASA), and the reduction was also evident in patients who received fibrinolytic therapy (14). The administration of triflusal was associated with a significantly lower risk of severe hemorrhage in comparison to acenocoumarol (INR 2-3) or to combination of the two drugs (INR 1.25-2.4); the incidence of this event was 0.4, 1.8, and 0.9%, respectively, for each treatment (46).…”
Section: Adverse Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two trials (the TACIP and TAPIRSS studies) involved patients with cerebral infarction (15,42), one trial (the NASPEAF study) studied triflusal in thromboprophylaxis for atrial fibrillation (46) and one (the TIM study) involved patients with myocardial infarction (14). The meta-analysis included clinical trials in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction (13).…”
Section: Adverse Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation