2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2009.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomization in the first hitting time problem

Abstract: In this paper we consider the following inverse problem for the first hitting time distribution: given a Wiener process with a random initial state, probability distribution, F (t), and a linear boundary, b(t) = µt, find a distribution of the initial state such that the distribution of the first hitting time is F (t). This problem has important applications in credit risk modeling where the process represents, so-called, distance to default of an obligor, the first hitting time represents a default event and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, some care has to be used to exclude that the found distribution of η has atoms together with a density. However, as already noted in [2,7], the function g may not be the Laplace transform of some probability density function, so in that case the IFPT problem has no solution; really, it may admit more than one solution, since the right-hand member of Equation (4) essentially furnishes the moments of η of any order n, but this is not always sufficient to uniquely determine the density g of η. In line of principle, the right-hand member of Equation (4) can be expressed in terms of the Laplace transform of f (t) = F (t), though it is not always possible to do this explicitly.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, some care has to be used to exclude that the found distribution of η has atoms together with a density. However, as already noted in [2,7], the function g may not be the Laplace transform of some probability density function, so in that case the IFPT problem has no solution; really, it may admit more than one solution, since the right-hand member of Equation (4) essentially furnishes the moments of η of any order n, but this is not always sufficient to uniquely determine the density g of η. In line of principle, the right-hand member of Equation (4) can be expressed in terms of the Laplace transform of f (t) = F (t), though it is not always possible to do this explicitly.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem, also known as the generalized Shiryaev problem, was studied in [1,2,7,8], essentially in the case when X(t) is BM and S(t) is a straight line; note that the question of the existence of the solution is not a trivial matter (see e.g., [2,7]). In this paper, by using the properties of the exponential martingale, we extend the results to more general boundaries S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…without reflecting (see e.g. [3]), [4], [25] ) the function g may not be the Laplace transform of some probability density function; in that case the IFPT problem has no solution. This is the reason why Theorem 2.4 is formulated in a conditional form.…”
Section: The Ifpt Problem For Reflected Brownian Motion With Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25]), in Biology, specially in the framework of diffusion models for neural activity (see e.g. [29]), and in Queueing theory (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%