1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90358-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random sequential adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

37
497
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 636 publications
(550 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
37
497
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Included in the table is the stopping density φ stop , relative system volume L d /v 1 (1/2) for the largest system, where v 1 (1/2) is the volume of a hypersphere, and the total number of configurations n conf . The results for d = 1, 2 and 3 agree well with known results for these dimensions [17,18,20,21,22]. We see that the stopping density φ stop is very nearly equal to the saturation density φ s for all dimensions, except for d = 1 where these two quantities are identical.…”
Section: A Saturation Densitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Included in the table is the stopping density φ stop , relative system volume L d /v 1 (1/2) for the largest system, where v 1 (1/2) is the volume of a hypersphere, and the total number of configurations n conf . The results for d = 1, 2 and 3 agree well with known results for these dimensions [17,18,20,21,22]. We see that the stopping density φ stop is very nearly equal to the saturation density φ s for all dimensions, except for d = 1 where these two quantities are identical.…”
Section: A Saturation Densitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[17]. For 2 ≤ d < ∞, an exact determination of φ(∞) is not possible, but estimates for it have been obtained via computer experiments in two dimensions (circular disks) [18,20] and three dimensions (spheres) [21,22]. However, estimates of the saturation density φ(∞) in higher dimensions have heretofore not been obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a particle arriving at the surface is accepted if it does not overlap with a previously adsorbed one; otherwise it is rejected. Specific quantities, such as the maximum coverage of the surface, or jamming limit, are in accordance with some experimental results [3] [4] [5], so it was concluded that RSA was a good model when particles diffuse to the surface. However, further numerical studies which took into account the diffusion showed discrepancies in the pair distribution function [6].…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Rényi 2 introduced another famous one-dimensional RSA problem-the parking of cars along an unmarked curb. Feder 3 helped to make RSA a very popular tool for modeling monolayers obtained as a result of irreversible adsorption [4][5][6] . More recently, random packings generated by RSA have been of interest in a number of scientific fields, e.g., soft matter [7][8][9] , surface science 10 , mathematics 11 , telecommunication 12 and information theory 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%