2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman spectroscopy of graphene on AlGaN/GaN heterostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, at longer growth time, the I2D/IG ratio was found to decrease to 1.2 for all the PH + CH used at higher Ar flow rates, in comparison to using shorter growth time where the Raman intensity ratio is in agreement with the reported value for bilayer graphene [27]. Thus, for growth conditions that are suitably carbon lean, the graphene growth Interestingly, at longer growth time, the I 2D /I G ratio was found to decrease to 1.2 for all the P H+CH used at higher Ar flow rates, in comparison to using shorter growth time where the Raman intensity ratio is in agreement with the reported value for bilayer graphene [27]. Thus, for growth conditions that are suitably carbon lean, the graphene growth self-limits to the bilayer.…”
Section: The Effect Of Growth Timesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, at longer growth time, the I2D/IG ratio was found to decrease to 1.2 for all the PH + CH used at higher Ar flow rates, in comparison to using shorter growth time where the Raman intensity ratio is in agreement with the reported value for bilayer graphene [27]. Thus, for growth conditions that are suitably carbon lean, the graphene growth Interestingly, at longer growth time, the I 2D /I G ratio was found to decrease to 1.2 for all the P H+CH used at higher Ar flow rates, in comparison to using shorter growth time where the Raman intensity ratio is in agreement with the reported value for bilayer graphene [27]. Thus, for growth conditions that are suitably carbon lean, the graphene growth self-limits to the bilayer.…”
Section: The Effect Of Growth Timesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Increasing the growth time can also be seen to result in a line in the ternary plot which is a constant as the quality of graphene film remains insensitive to Ar flow rate at longer growth times (Figure 7). Interestingly, at longer growth time, the I2D/IG ratio was found to decrease to 1.2 for all the PH + CH used at higher Ar flow rates, in comparison to using shorter growth time where the Raman intensity ratio is in agreement with the reported value for bilayer graphene [27]. Thus, for growth conditions that are suitably carbon lean, the graphene growth self-limits to the bilayer.…”
Section: The Effect Of Growth Timesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Figure illustrates the Raman spectra of the flexible GaN/PDMS samples with and without the graphene layer. The peaks at 489 ± 1 (Si–O symmetry stretching), 709 ± 1 (C–Si–S symmetry stretching), 1411 ± 1 (C–H asymmetry stretching), 2906 ± 1 (C–H symmetry stretching), and 2966 ± 1 cm –1 (C–H asymmetry stretching) correspond to the PDMS substrate, while those at 568 ± 1 and 735 ± 1 cm –1 correspond to GaN . These peaks were observed in both of the samples.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The peaks corresponding to GaN are fine and sharp, indicating its excellent crystalline behavior. Three prominent features can be observed in the graphene-transferred sample, namely, two peaks corresponding to D and 2D and one G peak . The D peak located at 1354 ± 1 cm –1 originates from the TO phonon mode near the K points in the Brillouin zone.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The silicon substrate peak at 520cm -1 is so strong that makes the E 2 (high) weakened. The A 1 (LO) mode of three samples in different temperatures are observed in the region 584~612cm -1 which refers that the A 1 (LO) mode of InN located in 570cm -1 and 733.07cm -1 for GaN [7]. The peak positions move towards lower wavenumbers while the In compositions x increases, the main reason for this shift is structural defects in films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%