Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent publications have included evaluations on infection rates, prevalence, and mean intensity of infection in studies of snakes, amphisbaenians and lizards of the northeastern region of Brazil (Dias et al, 2005;Almeida et al, 2006a;Almeida et al 2006b;Almeida et al 2007;Almeida et al 2008a;Almeida et al 2008b;Anjos et al, 2008), nevertheless, only four lizard species were investigated. Dias et al (2005) reported a likely new species of Raillietiella aff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications have included evaluations on infection rates, prevalence, and mean intensity of infection in studies of snakes, amphisbaenians and lizards of the northeastern region of Brazil (Dias et al, 2005;Almeida et al, 2006a;Almeida et al 2006b;Almeida et al 2007;Almeida et al 2008a;Almeida et al 2008b;Anjos et al, 2008), nevertheless, only four lizard species were investigated. Dias et al (2005) reported a likely new species of Raillietiella aff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The snakes and lizards studied by these authors demonstrated overlapping diets, similar to that seen for A. alba and A. vermicularis in the present work. Almeida et al (2006) hypothesised that termites and ants must be the intermediate hosts of R. gigliolii, and we encountered these arthropods in the stomachs of both amphisbaenids species studied here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Almeida et al (2006) were able to collect only three specimens of A. alba and reported an infection rate of 33.3% (1/3) and an infection intensity of 3.0 ± 0.0. The results of the present study are quite different, demonstrating significantly higher prevalence and intensity of infection values (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations