2020
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiopacity of endodontic materials using two models for conversion to millimeters of aluminum

Abstract: Barbara ROMA (a) Hernán COAGUILA-LLERENA (a) Mário TANOMARU-FILHO (a) Andréa GONÇALVES (c) Rubens SPIN-NETO (d) Gisele FARIA (a)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite having the same radiopacifier, BD and BCR exhibited different radiopacity in both experimental time periods, which is probably related to the percentage of zirconium oxide. Previous studies have revealed low radiopacity for BD (Farrugia et al, 2018; Ochoa‐Rodrıguez et al, 2019; Ochoa‐Rodriguez et al, 2020). However, it is not possible to make comparisons between different radiopacity studies because several factors may interfere with the results, such as the X‐ray machine, exposure time, tube voltage, source‐to‐object distance, conventional radiography and digital radiography systems (Ochoa‐Rodrıguez et al, 2019; Ochoa‐Rodriguez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite having the same radiopacifier, BD and BCR exhibited different radiopacity in both experimental time periods, which is probably related to the percentage of zirconium oxide. Previous studies have revealed low radiopacity for BD (Farrugia et al, 2018; Ochoa‐Rodrıguez et al, 2019; Ochoa‐Rodriguez et al, 2020). However, it is not possible to make comparisons between different radiopacity studies because several factors may interfere with the results, such as the X‐ray machine, exposure time, tube voltage, source‐to‐object distance, conventional radiography and digital radiography systems (Ochoa‐Rodrıguez et al, 2019; Ochoa‐Rodriguez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the present study, the null hypothesis was rejected, as significant differences were found between the calcium silicate‐based materials in most of the evaluated parameters. Although previous studies have evaluated BD using similar methodologies (Adl et al, 2019; Farrugia et al, 2018; Marconyak et al, 2015; Ochoa‐Rodrıguez et al, 2019; Ochoa‐Rodriguez et al, 2020; Oliveira et al, 2020; Shokouhinejad et al, 2016; Vallés et al, 2015; Yoldas et al, 2016), few studies have used BCT (Guerreiro et al, 2021; Oliveira et al, 2020; Villa et al, 2020) and BCR (Benetti et al, 2019; Ghilotti et al, 2020; López‐García et al, 2019), which are new ready‐to‐use materials. To assess crown discolouration by these materials in the presence of blood components, a model was designed to simulate the clinical situation of partial pulpotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was reported that it is sufficient to convert the pixel values to equivalent millimeters of aluminum. Besides, digital radiography systems generally showed the lowest radiopacity variability of the methodologies compared with the photo densitometer used in conventional radiographs 20 . The radiographic images with digital systems were not influenced by exposure time due to the broad latitude of the phosphor plate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hem ANSI/ADA 7 hem de ISO 6 standartlarına göre 1 mm kalınlığındaki endodontik siman, en az 3 milimetre alüminyuma (mmAl) eşdeğer bir radyoopasiteye sahip olmalıdır. 8 Standart protokole göre alüminyum penetrometre ile ışınlanmış D hızında okluzal film kullanılması, röntgen cihazının voltajının 65±5 kVp olması ve röntgen cihazının objeye mesafesinin 30 cm olması gerektiği bildirilmiştir. 9 Dental materyallerin radyoopasitesi, geleneksel radyografların sayısallaştırılmış görüntüleri kullanılarak indirekt teknik 10,11 veya dijital radyografi ile direkt teknik kullanılarak değerlendirilmektedir.…”
Section: Dijital Radyografiunclassified