2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon and stable isotopes in Palmyra corals during the past century

Abstract: Annual samples from two Palmyra Atoll corals (Porites lutea) that lived during the past 110 years were analyzed for radiocarbon (D 14 C) and d 18 O. The D 14 C values decreased 7.6& from 1896 to 1953, similar to other coral records from the tropical and subtropical Pacific. D 14 C values rose from $À60& to $+110& by 1980 due to the input of bomb radiocarbon from the atmosphere. Elevated D 14 C values were observed for the mid-to late-1950s, suggesting early input of bomb radiocarbon, possibly from the largest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of ocean transport via surface currents, the coral bomb 14 C record that may be the most complicated was from Palmyra Atoll. While the Δ 14 C record from Palmyra is low resolution, a rise of up to 40‰ was attributed to nuclear testing in the PPG [ Druffel‐Rodriguez et al ., ]. The record appears to indicate the 14 C signal arrived within the first elevated sample (1955).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of ocean transport via surface currents, the coral bomb 14 C record that may be the most complicated was from Palmyra Atoll. While the Δ 14 C record from Palmyra is low resolution, a rise of up to 40‰ was attributed to nuclear testing in the PPG [ Druffel‐Rodriguez et al ., ]. The record appears to indicate the 14 C signal arrived within the first elevated sample (1955).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The coral 14 C records at Okinawa and Palmyra provided the lowest temporal resolution for comparison with the modeling. There was some agreement and general confirmation of speculation that the origin of these moderate, early 14 C spikes was from the PPG [ Konishi et al ., ; Druffel‐Rodriguez et al ., ]. For Okinawa, the first elevated Δ 14 C values were from Operation Castle arriving at 1955.2, which was primarily from initial sources that entered the upper surface strata (77% from 0 to 41 m).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intercolony Sr/Ca and δ 18 O offsets observed at Palmyra cannot be explained by diagenesis, despite ample evidence that diagenesis can introduce significant artifacts in coral Sr/Ca and δ 18 O records (Sayani et al, ). Diagenesis levels can vary significantly on millimeter scales in any given coral core (e.g., Bar‐Matthews et al, ; Hathorne et al, ; Hendy et al, ), and typically produce large, nonclimatic fluctuations in coral Sr/Ca and δ 18 O instead of uniform offsets observed in our ensemble of modern coral records (e.g., Druffel‐Rodriguez et al, ). Furthermore, with the exception of the pre‐1997 section of P13, SEM images do not show evidence of significant or consistent alteration in any of the remaining cores (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average of all ∆ 14 C results in the Galapagos coral (−68.4 ± 3.8‰ SD n = 129) from 1939 to 1954 is the lowest of any tropical or subtropical location studied to date in the nonpolar oceans. For comparison, the prebomb ∆ 14 C value at Palau (7°17′N, 134°15′E) was −56.7 ± 1.6‰ ( n = 18) [ Glynn et al ., ], Hawaii (19°31′N, 155°58′W) was −50.8 ± 2.0‰ ( n = 12) [ Druffel et al ., ], Palmyra (5°52′N, 162°07′W) was −57.9 ± 1.8‰ ( n = 15) [ Druffel‐Rodriguez et al ., ], Fanning (3°55′N, 159°19′W) was −47.1 ± 11.8‰ ( n = 129) [ Grottoli et al . ], Langkai in the Indonesian throughflow (5°02′S, 119°04′E) was −56.4 ± 3.0‰ ( n = 144) [ Fallon and Guilderson , ], Rarotonga in the southwest Pacific (21°14′S, 159°49′W) was −50.8 ± 4.3‰ ( n = 123) [ Guilderson et al ., ], and Nauru (0°32′S, 166°30′E) was −57.9 ± 6.1‰ ( n = 77) [ Guilderson et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%