2022
DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioactive Iodine: Recognizing the Need for Risk-Benefit Balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data included DTC patients for a total of 13 years from 1988 to 2001 (n = 18,882) and reported that RAI treatment was not associated with an increased risk of SPM [20]. Therefore, it is important to recognize the need for risk-benefit balance for DTC patients treated with RAI [21]. Previous studies using SEER tend to have a small sample size, short research time, or short follow-up time [4,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data included DTC patients for a total of 13 years from 1988 to 2001 (n = 18,882) and reported that RAI treatment was not associated with an increased risk of SPM [20]. Therefore, it is important to recognize the need for risk-benefit balance for DTC patients treated with RAI [21]. Previous studies using SEER tend to have a small sample size, short research time, or short follow-up time [4,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%