2017
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/7/075201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative properties of matter based on quantum statistical method

Abstract: We present the preliminary results of our code OPAQS (opacity calculation using quantum statistical model) that is based on the self consistent Hartree-Fock-Slater model for the average atom. The code is capable of performing robust calculations of average charge state, frequency-dependent and mean opacities. The accuracy of the atomic model is verified by comparing the calculations of average charge state with various published results. The monochromatic opacities for iron computed at different sets of temper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3)), but now the bound states (those whose energy is below the threshold 0 ) are excluded from ρ f . At this point, the present implementation differs from the one recently proposed by Kouser et al [19], which employ a constant free electron density, equal to the electron density at the atomic shell boundary.…”
Section: Average Atom Modelmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3)), but now the bound states (those whose energy is below the threshold 0 ) are excluded from ρ f . At this point, the present implementation differs from the one recently proposed by Kouser et al [19], which employ a constant free electron density, equal to the electron density at the atomic shell boundary.…”
Section: Average Atom Modelmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(6)- (17). The number of free electrons Z f can be obtained by integration of the free electron density, (11): (19) or, alternatively, because of the charge neutrality condition, Eq. 13,…”
Section: Free Chargesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section can be found a gross summary of the average atom models evolution according to the progressive treatment of bound and free electrons in the ion-sphere model and according also to the quantum numbers with respect to splitting of the matter structure, of first generation with n-splitting (NOHEL, XSN [8]), of second generation with nl-splitting [10][11][12][13] and of third generation with nlj-splitting (THERMOS, ATMED LTE & CR, OPAQS, …) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Highlighting some formulas, it can be noticed the long-term maintained evolution of atomic codes considering the average atom as a statistical item of energy configuration levels (ground state of minimum energy, single excited, doubly excited, autoionizing level, etc.…”
Section: Average Atom Models Evolution and Generationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These versions of AA models are used in different standard codes, e.g., Thomas Fermi model (TF), quantum statistical model (QSM), or quantum self consistent field (QSCF) as referred in Ref. [12] are used in codes THERMOS, CASSANDRA, [13] OPAQS, [14] etc. Another famous class of AA models is based on the finite temperature density functional theory (FTDFT) which is basically an electron density variational model [15,16] based on Khon-Sham equations developed in codes like multi average ion model (Multi-AIM), [17] while AA model based on screening constants, i.e., screened hydrogenic model with l-splitting (SHML) [18,19] for the construction of hydrogenic potential is used in codes like ATMED, [20] SCAALP, [21] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%