BackgroundTreatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer includes neoadjuvant chemoradiation (chemoRT) and esophagectomy. We evaluated perioperative and oncologic outcomes among patients who received neoadjuvant chemoRT and immunotherapy (I/O).MethodsAdults who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoRT or chemoRT+I/O for T1-4, N0-3, M0 esophageal cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2012-2020). Unadjusted, propensity score-matched, and Cox proportional hazards analyses compared perioperative outcomes and three-year overall survival (OS) between neoadjuvant chemoRT versus chemoRT+I/O cohorts.ResultsAmong 17,937 patients, 261 (1.5%) received neoadjuvant chemoRT+I/O. ChemoRT+I/O patients were younger (62 versus 64 years, p=0.002) and had a longer interval between chemotherapy and surgery (104.5 versus 97.0 days, p<0.001) compared with chemoRT patients. Among the chemoRT+I/O cohort, there were more undifferentiated tumors (46.4% versus 34.3%, p<0.001) with adenocarcinoma histology (93.9% versus 81.2%, p<0.001) compared with the chemoRT cohort. On unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences regarding margin positivity, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, or 90-day mortality. ChemoRT+I/O patients had higher 3-year OS (61.4% 95%CI [54.2-67.7] versus 55.1% [54.3-55.9], p=0.02), more lymph nodes resected (median 17.0 IQR [11.0-25.0] versus 15.0 [10.0-22.0], p=0.007), and less pathologic nodal downstaging from N2 to N1/N0 (36.8% vs 48.4%, p<0.001) than chemoRT patients. Propensity score-matched analyses (n=217) revealed no differences in perioperative outcomes and 3-year OS (65.0% 95%CI [57.1-71.8] versus 56.0% [48.0-63.3], p=0.11) between the chemoRT+I/O and chemoRT cohort.ConclusionsThere were similar perioperative outcomes and 3-year OS between patients who received neoadjuvant chemoRT+I/O and chemoRT, supporting the feasibility of adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant regimens.