1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0534(1999)11:3<121::aid-cmr2>3.0.co;2-z
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Radiation damping diagnostics

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
18
6
1
0

Citation Types

0
19
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
19
3
1

Relationship

0
23

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 23 publications

(19 citation statements)
references

References 34 publications

0
19
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The optimal mixing period can be determined from an incremented array of mixing times, and the time point yielding the smallest solvent signal chosen. As mentioned, this delay may be substantially shorter than expected due to radiation damping (18, 19–22, 45). To avoid overshooting, we recommend starting with short delays, e.g., 1 ms.…”
Section: Background Of the 1d‐noesy
mentioning
confidence: 77%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The optimal mixing period can be determined from an incremented array of mixing times, and the time point yielding the smallest solvent signal chosen. As mentioned, this delay may be substantially shorter than expected due to radiation damping (18, 19–22, 45). To avoid overshooting, we recommend starting with short delays, e.g., 1 ms.…”
Section: Background Of the 1d‐noesy
mentioning
confidence: 77%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…RAdiation Damping Difference SpectroscopY (RADDSY) compares relaxation after a short (0.4 ms) rectangular 90° pulse in the absence and presence of RD followed by another 90° readout pulse 32,52 . A shift of a trapezoidal crusher gradient (amplitude G=14$$ G=14 $$ mT/m; duration 3 ms) yields two sequence variants: (i) 90°Gτ90°normalADC$$ {90}^{{}^{\circ}}\hbox{--} G\hbox{--} \tau \hbox{--} {90}^{{}^{\circ}}\hbox{--} \mathrm{ADC} $$ (undamped reference) and (ii) 90°τG90°normalADC$$ {90}^{{}^{\circ}}\hbox{--} \tau \hbox{--} G\hbox{--} {90}^{{}^{\circ}}\hbox{--} \mathrm{ADC} $$ (damped case).…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAdiation Damping Difference SpectroscopY (RADDSY) compares relaxation after a short (0.4 ms) rectangular 90 • pulse in the absence and presence of RD followed by another 90 • readout pulse. 32,52 A shift of a trapezoidal crusher gradient (amplitude G = 14 mT/m; duration 3 ms) yields two sequence variants: (i) 90 • -G-𝜏-90 • -ADC (undamped reference) and (ii) 90 • -𝜏-G-90 • -ADC (damped case). The ADC (analog-to-digital converter) period indicates the time of signal detection; 𝜏 is an evolution time (between 5 and 6000 ms).…”
Section: Rd During Free Precession
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…RD is most readily identified in relaxation measurements, where radiation damping greatly accelerates relaxation processes. , However, effects of RD are widespread, in part because RD also complicates pulse width nutation experiments, thereby extending effects related to miscalibrations to experiments dependent on accurate pulse widths . Previous literature , suggested that the diffusion coefficients in simple spin–echo (Figure a) based PFG-NMR experiments are distorted by RD.…”
Section: The Pfg-nmr Experiments
mentioning
confidence: 99%