2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Tracking and Motion-Sensitive Cameras on Flowers Reveal the Development of Pollinator Multi-Destination Routes over Large Spatial Scales

Abstract: Automated tracking of bumblebees and computer simulations reveal how bees locate a series of flowers and optimize their routes to visit them all.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
238
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
238
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To limit foraging costs, individuals optimize different parameters linked to foraging such as the distance they travel (Bell, 1990; Pyke, 1984). For example, bumblebees are able to adjust their trap lines linking different flowers in few foraging bouts to reduce the duration of the nectar collection (Lihoreau et al., 2012). One limiting key parameter is, however, the maximal distance an individual is able to travel going back home, called homing ability (Van Nieuwstadt & Ruano Iraheta, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To limit foraging costs, individuals optimize different parameters linked to foraging such as the distance they travel (Bell, 1990; Pyke, 1984). For example, bumblebees are able to adjust their trap lines linking different flowers in few foraging bouts to reduce the duration of the nectar collection (Lihoreau et al., 2012). One limiting key parameter is, however, the maximal distance an individual is able to travel going back home, called homing ability (Van Nieuwstadt & Ruano Iraheta, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems associated with human monitoring of flower-naïve bee behaviour, in real time, are compounded here because the occurrence of rare events over long observation periods almost inevitably leads to decreases in vigilance (Warm et al, 2009). Two low-cost technological advances are now available: (1) while video recordings are commonplace (Leonard and Papaj, 2011), motion-sensitive camcorders (Lihoreau et al, 2012;Orbán and Plowright, 2013) have the added advantage of recording a specified length clip only when a specific pattern of movement is detected in the viewfinder. This feature is particularly well suited to this area of investigation because it filters out much of the time during which there is no activity around the stimuli.…”
Section: Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sensors are invasive, active (i.e., they require their own battery) with a non-negligible cost, and they may alter the animal behavior. Radar systems have been used for tracking small animals, such as low flying insects (honey bees [14], bumblebees [15], hornets [16], butterflies [17]), ground walking invertebrates (beetles and snails [18]) and vertebrates (frogs [19]). So far however, this approach has required the use of harmonic radars, which are expensive, difficult to transport, restrained to tracking one or few individuals simultaneously, and have relatively poor time (3 seconds) and spatial (1 meter) resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%