Racial inequalities in multimorbidity: baseline of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

Abstract

Background Evidence of multimorbidity has come mainly from high-income regions, while disparities among racial groups have been less explored. This study examined racial differences in multimorbidity in the multiracial cohort of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto), ELSA-Brasil. Methods The study examined baseline (2008–2010) data for 14 099 ELSA-Brasil participants who self-reported being white, mixed-race, or black. A list of 16 morbidities was used to evaluate multimorbidity, operationalised by simple count into ≥ 2, ≥ 3, ≥ 4, ≥ 5 and ≥ 6 morbidities, in addition to evaluating the number of coexisting conditions. Prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated from logistic models and a quantile model was used to examine racial differences graphically in the distribution quantiles for the number of morbidities. Results Overall prevalence of multimorbidity (≥ 2 morbidities) was 70% and, after controlling for age and sex, was greater among mixed-race and black participants – by 6% (PR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03–1.08) and 9% (PR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.06–1.12), respectively – than among white participants. As the cutoff value for defining multimorbidity was raised, so the strength of the association increased, especially among blacks: if set at ≥ 6 morbidities, the prevalence was 27% greater for those of mixed-race (PR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.07–1.50) and 47% greater for blacks (PR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.22–1.76) than for whites. The disparities were smaller in the lower morbidity distribution quantiles and larger in the upper quantiles, indicating a heavier burden of disease, particularly on blacks. Conclusions Multimorbidity was common among adults and older adults in a Brazilian cohort, but important racial inequalities were found. Raising the cutoff point for defining multimorbidity revealed stronger associations between race/skin colour and multimorbidity, indicating a higher prevalence of multimorbidity among mixed-race and black individuals than among whites and that the former groups coexisted more often with more complex health situations (with more coexisting morbidities). Interventions to prevent and manage the condition of multimorbidity that consider the social determinants of health and historically discriminated populations in low- and middle-income regions are necessary.

Managing medical and psychiatric multimorbidity in older patients

“…Rather than conceptualizing race and ethnicity as a ‘risk factor’, which runs the risk of classifying the issue as biologic, economic, or cultural and potentially places blame on individuals within a group, commentators have suggested looking at ‘racism, not race’ at intrapersonal, institutional, and structural levels. 175 Racial and ethnic discrimination exists in many forms, having been studied across many racial groups, 44 , 179 – 182 in forms ranging from childhood racial discrimination, everyday discrimination, and major discriminatory events (i.e., infrequent incidents that require a significant shift or adjustment in one’s life). 44 , 182 A 2015 meta-analysis found racism to have a deleterious effect on physical and mental health, 183 and racial discrimination has been associated with a two-fold risk for reporting one 12-month psychiatric disorder, and three-fold risk for reporting two or more psychiatric disorders.…”

Access and Use of Health Services by People with Diabetes from the Item Response Theory

“…Considering race/color as a proxy for socioeconomic level, these findings suggest that there are inequities of access and use of health services for brown people in the Central–West region of the country. This may be associated with income, which limits access to goods and services [ 42 , 43 ].…”

Apontamentos sobre Saúde do Trabalhador, gênero e raça em disciplina de pósgraduação: relato de experiência

“…Os primeiros casos de Covid-19 identificados afetando pessoas de alto poder aquisitivo que tiveram a infecção após viagens ao exterior e que sobreviveram à pandemia contrastavam com a exposição de trabalhadores que não puderam cumprir isolamento, como a empregada que não foi dispensada pela 'patroa' de ir até a sua casa e adquiriu a infecção que resultou em óbito. No noticiário, não havia menção à raça, mas sabe-se que 67% das trabalhadoras domésticas brasileiras são negras 20 e que fatores de risco como hipertensão arterial e obesidade atingem mais a população negra, especialmente as mulheres [21][22][23][24] . Os fatos desenhavam na prática os condicionantes das relações entre saúde, doença e trabalho e expressavam de forma inequívoca a determinação social do processo saúde-doença em que raça, gênero e classe social se interseccionam, determinando o desfecho.…”