Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Healthcare-associated Infections Under the Shadow of Structural Racism: Narrative Review and Call to Action

Abstract

Purpose of ReviewThe purpose of this study is to review racial and ethnic inequities in the incidence and prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the USA, identify gaps in the literature, and recommend future directions to mitigate these inequities. Recent Findings While some existing literature has identified the presence of racial/ethnic inequities in HAI incidence and outcomes, few studies to date have evaluated whether HAI prevention efforts have mitigated these inequities. Factors contributing to inequities in HAI prevention may include unconscious bias of healthcare professionals towards minoritized patients; socioeconomic and structural inequities disparately affecting minoritized communities; the racial segregation of quality healthcare through hospital price discrimination; divergent reimbursement rates between public and private insurers; policies or performance metrics which underfund and financially penalize safety-net hospitals; and insufficient research evaluating and addressing HAI inequities. Summary Expansion of the literature is needed to further interrogate root causes and evaluate the impact of interventions on racial/ethnic inequities in HAI incidence. Measures to mitigate inequities might include teaching healthcare workers how to recognize and mitigate unconscious biases, expanding community resources which address the social and structural determinants of health, increasing access to preventive health services, reforming federal and institutional policies to better support safety-net hospitals and disincentivize price discrimination, and improving diversity and inclusion within the health workforce. KeywordsHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) • Racial/ethnic disparities • Structural racism • Health policy • Social determinants of health This article is part of the Topical Collection on Healthcare Associated Infections

Epidemiology of ICU-Onset Bloodstream Infection: Prevalence, Pathogens, and Risk Factors Among 150,948 ICU Patients at 85 U.S. Hospitals*

“…Our study identified demographic factors, chronic conditions, and acute presentations that providers could be cognizant of while gauging risk of ICU-onset BSI. Black and Hispanic patients displayed a higher risk for ICU-onset BSI compared with White patients further widening existing healthcare disparities even around healthcare-associated conditions (32, 33). Chronic conditions including neurologic and hepatic disorders, coagulopathy, arrhythmias, weight loss, and acute presentations such as trauma, acute respiratory, and gastrointestinal dysfunction were associated with acquisition of ICU-onset BSI.…”

Trends and Disparities in Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection Hospitalizations in the United States: A Ten-Year Joinpoint Trend Analysis

“…The reasons behind these findings are still uncertain and require further studies to elucidate. However, they may suggest socioeconomic and structural inequities disparately affecting minoritized communities including an inequitable distribution of quality healthcare, differential access to public and private insurance, and insufficient research evaluating and addressing these inequities [ 34 ].…”

Association of Biomarker-Based Artificial Intelligence With Risk of Racial Bias in Retinal Images

“…The effects of conscious and unconscious biases in medicine have rightly become an important area of research, education, and advocacy. It has been well-documented that clinicians can be biased by patients’ gender, sexual orientation, weight, race, ethnicity, etc, which can ultimately affect diagnoses and subsequent treatment decisions . With the number of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in clinical medicine increasing, so has the attention paid to their potential biases .…”