Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Health from Population‐Based Research to Practice‐Based Research: The Example of Oral Health

Abstract

Oral health serves as an excellent model for understanding social disparities in health. Associations among race, socioeconomic status, oral health, and dental care are strong. Multiple points along the dental care process allow investigation of disparities and mechanisms; and there are multiple types of treatment services (ranging from those that all patients and clinicians would likely agree on, to multiple treatment options, to discretionary treatments). Florida Dental Care Study (FDCS) data are used to provide examples of these concepts. Without regard to whether the dental care system was ultimately entered, the FDCS found substantive social differences in 1) incidence of need; 2) responsiveness to this need; and 3) propensity to seek preventive services. Once the dental care system had been accessed, substantive social differences were still evident with regard to 1) clinical condition; 2) awareness of treatment options; and 3) treatment discussions and recommendations. Once differences in clinical condition were taken into account, and once analysis was limited to persons who had entered the dental care system, social differences in receipt of care were still evident. Findings suggested that although dental care was effective at treating and preventing certain oral conditions, social differences in treatment effectiveness were evident.

The oral health of seniors in Brazil: addressing the consequences of a historic lack of public health dentistry in an unequal society

“…Previous studies demonstrate socio‐economic differences between the macroregions in Brazil and between blacks and whites . In relation to skin colour, nonwhites had a higher NOT, NTT, NPT e NPR.…”

Dental demographics and metrics of oral diseases in the ageing Australian population

“…Purely clinical measures of oral health such as DMFT for dental caries experience and attachment loss or bleeding on probing for periodontal disease do not take into consideration the functional and psycho‐social aspects of health and disease, nor do they always accurately reflect the health status, functioning and perceived needs of individuals. Gilbert describes a model of oral health comprising five dimensions, namely oral disease and tissue damage, oral pain and discomfort, oral functional limitation, oral disadvantage and self‐rated oral health . Oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) can be thought of as comprising the components of oral pain and discomfort, oral functional limitation, oral disadvantage and self‐rated oral health.…”

Xerostomia: an update for clinicians

“…Purely clinical measures of oral health such as caries experience and periodontal disease do not take into consideration the functional and psychosocial aspects of health and disease, nor do they always accurately reflect the health status, functioning and perceived needs of individuals. Oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) describes a model of oral health comprising components of oral pain and discomfort, oral functional limitation, oral disadvantage and self‐rated oral health 29 …”