Questions contemporaines en psychologie

Ohayon, Annick; Plas, Régine; Tapia, Claude

doi:10.3917/jdp.339.0051

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This distinction was then overlaid with further dichotomies such as the contrasts between explanation and understanding, quantitative and qualitative methods and the nomothetic and idiographic approaches (Bouterse and Karstens, 2015). Even the status of science, claimed by the first scientific psychologists in order to differentiate their field from philosophy, was heavily criticized by philosophers (Ohayon and Plas, 2011). The position of psychology remains hotly debated even today, with some psychologists declaring allegiance to the natural sciences and others to the humanities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social representations of psychology: When paradoxes become a strength

Caillaud¹,

Haas

Drozda‐Senkowska

2021

Social Science Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article investigates the understanding by different groups of what psychology is and what psychologists do. We first recall some of the tensions that fuelled the discipline and underpinned its institutionalization in France. Then, drawing on social representations (SR) theory and on the wind-rose model, we explore how SR of psychology and of the psychologist are developed in two different groups and when these groups come together. The first study shows how future psychologists construct, during their studies, a paradoxical understanding of the discipline and of the profession, which echoes some historical tensions: they neither abandon common-sense ideas, nor do they integrate the different psychological dimensions to develop a global approach to the person. The second study, conducted in a context of legal innovation faced by multi-professional teams in charge of assessing disabilities, shows how very different representations of the discipline and of the profession are developed in order to serve local power relationships. Finally, the third study looks at SR constructed through psychological practices by analyzing reports written by psychologists and addressed to these teams. Through their writings, psychologists reconstruct historical tensions, but they also strategically emphasize the different facets of the discipline depending on the issue at play. Thus, when they address these teams with various representations of the discipline and diverse expectations of psychologists, the tensions structuring psychology may become a strength and serve their legitimacy. All in all, the social representations of psychology and of the psychologist appears as a dynamic and interactive process.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%